October 20, 200817 yr Colt McCoy Right now there's no doubt in my mind. His completion percentage and TD-Int ratio are crazy. In addition he beat Bradford on a nuetral field.
October 20, 200817 yr Kool-Aid. :lol: I've watched both guys 4 times now. McCoy has the more complete O, and Bradford is the better QB...
October 20, 200817 yr Right now there's no doubt in my mind. His completion percentage and TD-Int ratio are crazy. In addition he beat Bradford on a nuetral field. And what was the main difference in that game? Running game. It certainly wasn't because McCoy had better numbers. Try again...
October 20, 200817 yr McCoy IMO will be a solid NFL QB, Bradford will be a stud for years to come...That's the difference IMO.
October 20, 200817 yr And what was the main difference in that game? Running game. It certainly wasn't because McCoy had better numbers. Try again... Well I was just going by what you said about OU being the best team in all of college football just a couple weeks ago. I'll take the QB that won the big game you can have the one that had more TD's. Is the object of the sport winning? How's that try???
October 20, 200817 yr :lol: I've watched both guys 4 times now. McCoy has the more complete O, and Bradford is the better QB... It's not McCpy's fault that his team is capable of running the ball. Just a few weeks ago you were touting OU's line and saying they would drop 40 on everyone on their schedule. You've been wrong before right?
October 20, 200817 yr Well I was just going by what you said about OU being the best team in all of college football just a couple weeks ago. I'll take the QB that won the big game you can have the one that had more TD's. Is the object of the sport winning? How's that try??? Still amazingly weak in the context of this thread. If you think Bradford was the problem with Oklahoma in that loss you are S_T_R_E_C_H_I_N_G in epic proportions...
October 20, 200817 yr It's not McCpy's fault that his team is capable of running the ball. Just a few weeks ago you were touting OU's line and saying they would drop 40 on everyone on their schedule. You've been wrong before right? Keep clinging to one of the few times I've ever been wrong. Doesn't change Bradford as the best QB in the game. But you can keep trying if it makes you feel smart or something...
October 20, 200817 yr Still amazingly weak in the context of this thread. If you think Bradford was the problem with Oklahoma in that loss you are S_T_R_E_C_H_I_N_G in epic proportions... How did McCoy play that game? Over 80% with 19/3 for the number one team in the country who handed two top 5 teams big losses is pretty good right?
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.