Except for his views on the All "A" Classic debate, Westsider is almost always correct from what I've seen, and that comes from a lifelong eastern Kentuckian.

Thanks ... hey, nobody's perfect. :lol:

Except for his views on the All "A" Classic debate, Westsider is almost always correct from what I've seen, and that comes from a lifelong eastern Kentuckian.

 

In your opinion...

In your opinion...

In all honesty, much of what you think of my posts isn't based on what I say, but what you read into them.

In all honesty, much of what you think of my posts isn't based on what I say, but what you read into them.

 

Don't remember addressing you, but thats fine.

Don't remember addressing you, but thats fine.

Well, it was about me ...

Well, it was about me ...

 

True enough. I am used to people having motives behind what they say. If you don't, kudos to you. Guess thats my problem.

True enough. I am used to people having motives behind what they say. If you don't, kudos to you. Guess thats my problem.

How are these for motives? Stating opinions and relaying information ... that is the intended use of these boards.

How are these for motives? Stating opinions and relaying information ... that is the intended use of these boards.

 

I agree. Not all people are on that level though. Most people look to tout their team or tear down another. I have been guilty of that from time to time, as have most on here, but thats not to say that is my motive on the board.

As someone who watched UHA several times this year, I was dissappointed with their performance at the state tourney also. But Im not for sure if Hazard, Paintsville, or South Laurel would have played much better in that first game against Lex Cath. I think Elliott might have been a possible entertaining game but really not for sure if they could have handled all the bumping going on either.