What's the real difference between the three?

That's a good question?

 

I always thought intentials where meant to be called if a player grabbed another player without making an attempt for the ball. Like at the end of the game when you're trying to get the opponent to the free throw line. But you never see that called even when players are grabbing each other around the shoulders, WWE style. I thought you had to at least try to make it look like a reach in foul.

 

Flagrant would constitute physical contact w/o regard to injury.

 

And technical would be any unsportsmanlike activity that didn't fall into either of the other two categories.

 

Last night I saw physical contact during a dead ball called an intentional foul, so now I am also confused. Can anyone clarify?

I allways wondered about this myself. How come at the the end of a close game when a coach yells at a player to "foul him" why is that not sometimes a intentional foul. They are intentionaly fouling are they not. I know it will not change, but sometimes there are hard fouls that are made that need to be called intentional.

That's a good question?

 

I always thought intentials where meant to be called if a player grabbed another player without making an attempt for the ball. Like at the end of the game when you're trying to get the opponent to the free throw line. But you never see that called even when players are grabbing each other around the shoulders, WWE style. I thought you had to at least try to make it look like a reach in foul.

Flagrant would constitute physical contact w/o regard to injury.

 

And technical would be any unsportsmanlike activity that didn't fall into either of the other two categories.

 

Last night I saw physical contact during a dead ball called an intentional foul, so now I am also confused. Can anyone clarify?

 

You beat me to this and I agree

I know all three are shots and the ball, is there any other difference in how they are treated?

An intentional foul can also be called if the foul is excessive in nature even IF the defender was making a legitimate play on the ball.

Just called a referee friend.

 

Flagrant Foul

may be person or technical of a violant or savage nature. or technical non contact foul which is unacceptable in nature. It may or may not be intentional. If it is personal, it involves but not limited to striking, kicking and kneeing. If technical it involves dead ball contact or noncontact at anytime which is extreme or persistant, vulgar or abusive contact.

Fighting is automatically a flagrant foul.

 

Intentional Foul

A personal or technical foul which neutralizes an opponent's obvious advantage. Contact away from the ball or a player, that is specifically designed to stop or keep the clock from starting. It may or may not be premeditated. are not solely based on the severity of the act. and can be called if while playing the ball if excessive contact is made with the opponent.

 

Technical Foul

Foul by a non-player

A non contact foul by a player

An intentional or flagrant foul while the ball is dead except a foul by and airborne shooter.

A direct technical, charged to the head coach on the bench because of the their actions or for allowing a disqualified player to participate

An indirect technical foul, charged to the head coach as a result of unporting acts from the bench, or a team member grasping the ring or dunking the ball during pregame warmups or intermission.

 

I hope this helps.:thumb:

How would this work?

 

A player gets called for a foul, that would be a shooting foul. The coach gets a technical because he didn't like the call. Is it 4 shots and the ball or is it 2 shots with no one at the line and then two more shots?

How would this work?

 

A player gets called for a foul, that would be a shooting foul. The coach gets a technical because he didn't like the call. Is it 4 shots and the ball or is it 2 shots with no one at the line and then two more shots?

 

 

It's 4 free throws with the lane clear and then the ball at half court. Also,

the player that was fouled must shoot the first two free throws and then the opposing coach can choose anyone to shoot the technical.

It's 4 free throws with the lane clear and then the ball at half court. Also,

the player that was fouled must shoot the first two free throws and then the opposing coach can choose anyone to shoot the technical.

 

To clarify, as some may misinterpret "opposing coach," the coach that gets to choose the shooter is the coach of the shooting team.

How would this work?

 

A player gets called for a foul, that would be a shooting foul. The coach gets a technical because he didn't like the call. Is it 4 shots and the ball or is it 2 shots with no one at the line and then two more shots?

 

If the player that gets foulde is in the act of shooting or their team is in the bonus situation then it would be 2 shots or 1 + the bonus for the foul and in each of these instances there would be no other players permitted while attempts take place. Then it would be 2 shots for the technical plus the ball awarded to the team that just shot the attempts.

Best way to remember this is that they are done in the order that they happened. If team A is fouled before the "T" then team A gets two shots and then team B gets two shots and the ball.