September 17, 200719 yr I don't think he'll have a chance at winning it. I think last night's game hurt Brohm's chances a lot too. Not his performance. 368 is 368 against a , now, Top 25 team.
September 17, 200719 yr Woodson wasn't the best quarterback on the field Saturday night ... You may be right but the gap is very small.
September 17, 200719 yr You may be right but the gap is very small.Did I watch a different game? Even in the update thread EVERY uk person in there agreed with me that Woodson looked off. I know one game doesn't make the guy, but he didn't impress me Saturday. He did hit a guy that was wide open by ten yards, but come on, he looked bad almost that whole game before then. He hasn't thrown an INT in what 2 years, it's b/c his misses are SO bad no one could get near them.
September 17, 200719 yr Did I watch a different game? Even in the update thread EVERY uk person in there agreed with me that Woodson looked off. I know one game doesn't make the guy, but he didn't impress me Saturday. He did hit a guy that was wide open by ten yards, but come on, he looked bad almost that whole game before then. He hasn't thrown an INT in what 2 years, it's b/c his misses are SO bad no one could get near them. You watched one game. He was still pretty strong in this game. The gap is small and it will be interesting to see how the NFL evaluates each of them.
September 17, 200719 yr I said that. Right, so in one game you've already figured out that he's not close to Brohm and that he always overthrows people?
September 17, 200719 yr Right, so in one game you've already figured out that he's not close to Brohm and that he always overthrows people?No I didn't say that either. I shouldn't have quoted you, my statement wasn't directed at you.
September 17, 200719 yr You watched one game. He was still pretty strong in this game. The gap is small and it will be interesting to see how the NFL evaluates each of them. I think in terms of college QB, Brohm has the advantage. As a pro prospect I think Woodson's stock is higher.
September 17, 200719 yr It depends. It's not my choice. I don't own and NFL team..But if I did, I would take Brennan. You are losing your credibility around here. If you were to put Woodson in the same system as Brennan, there would be no comparison.
September 17, 200719 yr Woodson wasn't the best quarterback on the field Saturday night ... That can start a debate of it's own.:creepy:
September 17, 200719 yr I think in terms of college QB, Brohm has the advantage. As a pro prospect I think Woodson's stock is higher.Based on what? And don't think for a second that NFL teams don't look at pedigree.
September 17, 200719 yr Based on what? And don't think for a second that NFL teams don't look at pedigree. Woodson appears to be more mobile and has a better arm. Also his decision making is pretty darn good. You don't go 247 (I think) straight passes without a pick without being good at it.
September 17, 200719 yr I know winning helps you get seen in the Heisman voting but when did the Heisman winner have to come from a team with zero or one loss. There have been winners that have come from teams not in the national title hunt.
September 17, 200719 yr I know winning helps you get seen in the Heisman voting but when did the Heisman winner have to come from a team with zero or one loss. There have been winners that have come from teams not in the national title hunt.Two years in a row a non contender won it. 1989 Andrew Ware - Houston finished 14th in the AP 1990 Ty Detmer - BYU finished 22nd in the AP
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.