2 minutes ago, theguru said:

@Bac2369 deserves the credit and yes that was a great game. 

We gotta give these posters entertainment. Entertainment is what they got. What a ball game.

Bell Co showed me more in this loss than any of their previous wins. A 1 point loss to a top notch 5a team who's been playing very well the past month or so, is impressive. I had questions about how much of a contender they actually were, but, this game answered those questions. I'd say Bell is a top 2 or 3 team in 3a behind CAL and possibly Lex Cath, although I'd say them and Lex Cath are interchangeable. 

Just now, jeff jackson said:

Bell Co showed me more in this loss than any of their previous wins. A 1 point loss to a top notch 5a team who's been playing very well the past month or so, is impressive. I had questions about how much of a contender they actually were, but, this game answered those questions. I'd say Bell is a top 2 or 3 team in 3a behind CAL and possibly Lex Cath, although I'd say them and Lex Cath are interchangeable. 

My thoughts are close to your thoughts on both the game with Pulaski and the 3A teams but I think it is CAL, LexCath, Bell, and then who knows in 3A.

1 minute ago, theguru said:

My thoughts are close to your thoughts on both the game with Pulaski and the 3A teams but I think it is CAL, LexCath, Bell, and then who knows in 3A.

 I have no problem with that. I think Murray, Glasgow, Lloyd, Bourbon and Lawrence are on that next tier behind the top 3.  

1 hour ago, theguru said:

My thoughts are close to your thoughts on both the game with Pulaski and the 3A teams but I think it is CAL, LexCath, Bell, and then who knows in 3A.

 

1 hour ago, jeff jackson said:

 I have no problem with that. I think Murray, Glasgow, Lloyd, Bourbon and Lawrence are on that next tier behind the top 3.  

This may sound crazy coming from me considering I have rode Lloyd extremely hard this entire year but their not getting nearly enough respect. Which I get it, I hope to see them out perform most people's expectations..maybe even my own.

Bell did look extremely good, I still don't get how they lost that game. I keep going back to the 4 onsides giving Pulaski great field position.

4 minutes ago, Honey Badger said:

 

This may sound crazy coming from me considering I have rode Lloyd extremely hard this entire year but their not getting nearly enough respect. Which I get it, I hope to see them out perform most people's expectations..maybe even my own.

Bell did look extremely good, I still don't get how they lost that game. I keep going back to the 4 onsides giving Pulaski great field position.

I agree. They outplayed them for a big portion of the game but give Pulaski credit. They did what good teams do, hung around and found a way to get it done. 

39 minutes ago, jeff jackson said:

I agree. They outplayed them for a big portion of the game but give Pulaski credit. They did what good teams do, hung around and found a way to get it done. 

Yeah you can't give a good team the ball at the 50 or inside it everytime and expect to put them away. 

Coincidentally I was just giving Lloyd crap for squibbing the ball for like 3 weeks in a row when they were dominating kickoffs the first half of the year. Then the last 2 weeks they have kicked it deep and probably let one return make it out to the 25 and pinned multiple inside the 10.