Johnson is good with the X's and O's. But what is going on with the team? Playing time for a couple of the starters seems to be getting less with each game. Are they not working hard in practice?

Could we say that Russell will be 200 Proof?

 

 

Frances

Rule violation.

Could we say that Russell will be 200 Proof?

 

 

Frances

 

 

It took me a minute for that one to register. haha. Thats funny.

Johnson is good with the X's and O's. But what is going on with the team? Playing time for a couple of the starters seems to be getting less with each game. Are they not working hard in practice?

I think the kids always work hard in practice. Maybe they are just trying to find a right combination or trying to create some competition at certain positions. I'm sure the kids are not happy with the losses and are doing all they are capable of to right the ship.

Rule violation.

 

How so?

 

 

Frances

Russell-65

Raceland-48

Russell by 15....

This post was deleted by Old Rambler.

How so?

 

 

Frances

 

9. No discussion of ANY criminal behavior (charged or uncharged) in the high school forums. Discussion of adult criminal behavior is permitted in all non-high school forums. However, discussion of criminal behavior by juveniles (anyone under 18) is never permitted anywhere on BGP.

 

Even if it is implied. Which was pretty juvenile in its own right.

9. No discussion of ANY criminal behavior (charged or uncharged) in the high school forums. Discussion of adult criminal behavior is permitted in all non-high school forums. However, discussion of criminal behavior by juveniles (anyone under 18) is never permitted anywhere on BGP.

 

Even if it is implied. Which was pretty juvenile in its own right.

 

Well, I'm not certain what you are implying, but when I read my post, I see absolutely nothing, whatsoever, that speaks to criminal behaviour.

 

I realize that as the self appointed Captain of Cybercrime, some may have powers beyond those of a normal human, but in this case, I think you may be seeing things.

 

 

Frances

I think you may be seeing things.

Well, before anyone starts seeing pink elephants... let's knock off the alcohol related quips. :thumb:

Well, I'm not certain what you are implying, but when I read my post, I see absolutely nothing, whatsoever, that speaks to criminal behaviour.

 

I realize that as the self appointed Captain of Cybercrime, some may have powers beyond those of a normal human, but in this case, I think you may be seeing things.

 

 

Frances

I didn't imply anything. I accused you of something.

 

Seem to be awfully touchy for someone so innocent.

Well, before anyone starts seeing pink elephants... let's knock off the alcohol related quips. :thumb:

 

Fair enough. It seems I have touched a nerve with one of our fellow members.

 

 

Frances

I didn't imply anything. I accused you of something.

 

Seem to be awfully touchy for someone so innocent.

 

Noted - I stand accused of breaking a rule on BGP.

 

I just hope to live down the shame of your accusation.

 

Maybe my innocence will save me.

 

As for the game, I'll take the High Octane offense of Russell in this one.

 

 

 

Frances

Well , IMO the remark about 200 Proof was in poor taste. Opinion's like that need to be kept to yourself . That is how rumors get stated. How can you make judgement with out facts. That is called gossip.