October 2, 200619 yr There are guys that take cocaine, hire prostitutes, do whatever they want whenever they want, that never get disciplined because they never get caught. Teach Henry to stay out of trouble, he's a criminal so teach him to move his criminal acts inside and STAY OUT OF BARS!!!!!
October 2, 200619 yr Well then is it safe to say this is something that was long overdue? Did he deserve a suspension by Marvin in the past...yes. However, IMHO, to do it now, after he DID NOTHING WRONG (sorry, but if you are going to legislate a curfew on Monday nights, good luck to you), when you did nothing the countless times before seems silly and like he is placating to the fan-base. This is as weak, IMHO, as him under-scoring the importance of character about 24 hours before drafting Rucker and Nicholson. Hogwash. I think Henry is a chump, hands down, but to suspend him now seems weak to me. You have proof he was drinking Boucher? Are we going to suspend him if he has a beer in his living room in Florence? Slippery slope.
October 2, 200619 yr Well I just got done reading some articles on bengals.com and it seems like some of Henry's teammates were not really happy about the decision not to play Henry...
October 2, 200619 yr Well I just got done reading some articles on bengals.com and it seems like some of Henry's teammates were not really happy about the decision not to play Henry... How could you blame them? What was his "conduct" that was detrimental to the team? Hanging with Odell? Being outside at 3:00 a.m.? It smells like grandstanding to me -- I hope this wasn't a Mike Brown force-job, but it certainly smells like it to me.
October 2, 200619 yr How could you blame them? What was his "conduct" that was detrimental to the team? Hanging with Odell? Being outside at 3:00 a.m.? It smells like grandstanding to me -- I hope this wasn't a Mike Brown force-job, but it certainly smells like it to me. I dont think Mike Brown would have done that, if anything I bet he probably would have wanted him to play because it would have gave us a better chance to win.
October 2, 200619 yr Author Did he deserve a suspension by Marvin in the past...yes. However, IMHO, to do it now, after he DID NOTHING WRONG (sorry, but if you are going to legislate a curfew on Monday nights, good luck to you), when you did nothing the countless times before seems silly and like he is placating to the fan-base. This is as weak, IMHO, as him under-scoring the importance of character about 24 hours before drafting Rucker and Nicholson. Hogwash. I think Henry is a chump, hands down, but to suspend him now seems weak to me. You have proof he was drinking Boucher? Are we going to suspend him if he has a beer in his living room in Florence? Slippery slope. Something has soudned fishy about this from the beginning. I'm afraid we didn't get the whole story about this incident.
October 2, 200619 yr I dont think Mike Brown would have done that, if anything I bet he probably would have wanted him to play because it would have gave us a better chance to win. That doesn't sound like the Mike Brown I have grown up watching run this franchise...
October 2, 200619 yr That doesn't sound like the Mike Brown I have grown up watching run this franchise... Amen.
October 2, 200619 yr That doesn't sound like the Mike Brown I have grown up watching run this franchise... My thought exactly.
October 3, 200619 yr Author Read Marvin's comments. Sounds like something Parcells would say. Personally, I loved them. http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=ap-beatenbengals&prov=ap&type=lgns
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.