More DNC Problems

[Jesse James]

If this is true we have some serious issues. Trump will be the least of the Democrats problems.

 

Breaking: ‘Complete Panic’ at Highest Levels of DNC Over Kim DotCom's Seth Rich Announcement

[Getslow]

Aren't you in other threads jumping up and down about people talking about the president's campaign's connections to Russia because the evidence is too flimsy?

 

What is this? A convicted criminal's tweet and an anonymous post on 4Chan and we've got ourselves a bona fide panic at the DNC.

 

You're dividing America.

[Jesse James]

Here is a little more info.....

 

BOOM! Hacker Kim Dotcom: "I Knew Seth Rich Was the Wikileaks Source - I Was Involved" (Updated)

 

I learned a long time ago, if someone is really making alot of noise about someone else, they usually have the most to hide. This is a old CIA trick from the 50s.

 

As for me dividing anything, I have stated on the record if Trump himself is guilty of any collusion or wrong doing with the Russians or anyone else he needs removed. I have no inside info on his dealings with Russia, but neither does anyone on this board, NOR CNN, NOR FOX etc.

 

However the DNC has been proven to be corrupt and this would not be a surprise to anyone if this were to be proven, based on the previous corrupt practices by the Democratic leadership. Murder would not be surprising given their track record.

[Bipsic]

Please tell me how we are not to believe the New York Times and the Washington Post, but supposed to give credibility to the Gateway Pundit.

 

If you have time, can you also explain how it's ok to ask questions based on no evidence on anything related the Democrats, but claim the myriad reports about the Trump administration's (mis)handling of the Russia investigation (not to mention the substance of the investigation) aren't worth questioning?

[StickerMann]

Please tell me how we are not to believe the New York Times and the Washington Post, but supposed to give credibility to the Gateway Pundit.

 

If you have time, can you also explain how it's ok to ask questions based on no evidence on anything related the Democrats, but claim the myriad reports about the Trump administration's (mis)handling of the Russia investigation (not to mention the substance of the investigation) aren't worth questioning?

 

I've just spent the last twenty plus years asking the same questions of the media handling of all things Democratic & Clinton/Obama?? No idea who the Gateway Pundit is, but the other two have long ago established their bias!

[Colonels_Wear_Blue]

If this is true we have some serious issues. Trump will be the least of the Democrats problems.

 

Breaking: ‘Complete Panic’ at Highest Levels of DNC Over Kim DotCom's Seth Rich Announcement

 

So....when there are any "if this is true" statements made about your beloved President Trump, then you're first on the scene screaming "hey hey hey, this is fake news...this is CNN making up fantastical headlines". But then you turn right around and post a thread with a headline about the DNC and say "if this is true we will have serious problems"??

 

Do I really need to point out how much of a double standard you are consistently demonstrating, Jesse?

[Bipsic]

I've just spent the last twenty plus years asking the same questions of the media handling of all things Democratic & Clinton/Obama?? No idea who the Gateway Pundit is, but the other two have long ago established their bias!

 

I just don't even know what to say.

[StickerMann]

Understandable.

[Jesse James]

So....when there are any "if this is true" statements made about your beloved President Trump, then you're first on the scene screaming "hey hey hey, this is fake news...this is CNN making of fantastical headlines". But then you turn right around and post a thread with a headline about the DNC and say "if this is true we will have serious problems"??

 

Do I really need to point out how much of a double standard you are consistently demonstrating, Jesse?

 

If Trump is guilty, then remove him.

 

If the DNC had their hand in this then we have trouble.

 

Lets see:

1. Collusion with the Russians

2. Murder

 

Is this not a issue if true? Is it ok for countless hours to be spent on "possible collusion" by Trump and not take this as a issue? I mean there is as much evidence for murder now as there is collusion. If you have more please post a link. I posted a link that said this guy was the leaker and the other guy saying he was part of it. Now that sheds some bad light on the Russia stuff the left has been posting , but thats where we are here. Also is it ok for the left to push "possible collsuon" and not if anyone questions "possible murder" by the Democratic party, and in fact, that Clintons main main, Podesta may have had his hand in it and if he did, well I think we get the trail.....

 

So now you tell me whats the difference?

[Jesse James]

Please tell me how we are not to believe the New York Times and the Washington Post, but supposed to give credibility to the Gateway Pundit.

 

If you have time, can you also explain how it's ok to ask questions based on no evidence on anything related the Democrats, but claim the myriad reports about the Trump administration's (mis)handling of the Russia investigation (not to mention the substance of the investigation) aren't worth questioning?

 

Are you saying the accusations that this article has reported are false. They published a public twitter profile with a tweet with someone fessing up to he was part of this. That would be too much like actually reporting the news or something that actually happened without said spin from the DNC or liberals.

[Jesse James]

And if true, not only murder, but murder of a American citizen, and one of their own. And ask Ole Bernie if they care to stick one of their own?

[Colonels_Wear_Blue]

If Trump is guilty, then remove him.

 

If the DNC had their hand in this then we have trouble.

 

Lets see:

1. Collusion with the Russians

2. Murder

 

Is this not a issue if true? Is it ok for countless hours to be spent on "possible collusion" by Trump and not take this as a issue? I mean there is as much evidence for murder now as there is collusion. If you have more please post a link. I posted a link that said this guy was the leaker and the other guy saying he was part of it. Now that sheds some bad light on the Russia stuff the left has been posting , but thats where we are here. Also is it ok for the left to push "possible collsuon" and not if anyone questions "possible murder" by the Democratic party, and in fact, that Clintons main main, Podesta may have had his hand in it and if he did, well I think we get the trail.....

 

So now you tell me whats the difference?

 

The point is, whenever something is stated about the right with out substantiated evidence, you cry foul and say it's fake news before there is a chance to substantiate the statement. Then you're turning around and doing the EXACT SAME THING and trying to claim that you aren't. Plainly inconsistent.

[Jesse James]

The point is, whenever something is stated about the right with out substantiated evidence, you cry foul and say it's fake news before there is a chance to substantiate the statement. Then you're turning around and doing the EXACT SAME THING and trying to claim that you aren't. Plainly inconsistent.

 

If you will read my posts I have been consistent on a few things.

 

1. I dont really like Trump. He was my last choice. And he was flawed, heavily flawed, but was far better than the other choice.

 

2. I have stated that if he is guilty he needs to be removed.

 

3. And the most consistent of all is that I think the news media are crooks as well as the DNC. I do not think they have given Trump a fair shake and that is quite obvious. I also think the left are a bunch of hypocrites that cry foul if anyone calls them on the bias. I just posted a thread that has a guy admitting he was part of the leaks publicly on Twitter and immediately get called to the carpet for being biased?

 

So to clarify, I am just upset over the bias and hypocrisy of the left. I am not upset over the investigation of Trump. Let it play out and see if there is collusion by Trump. But lets treat everyone the same. I seen a Obama love fest for 8 years after mistake after mistake and now before Trump can even get started the hatchet job is on, and it makes me sick.

[Bipsic]

Are you saying the accusations that this article has reported are false. They published a public twitter profile with a tweet with someone fessing up to he was part of this. That would be too much like actually reporting the news or something that actually happened without said spin from the DNC or liberals.

 

Yes. I am saying the accusations in the article are false.

 

I'm also wondering why every time I ask you a question you never answer but instead ask me a question?

[Jesse James]

Please tell me how we are not to believe the New York Times and the Washington Post, but supposed to give credibility to the Gateway Pundit.

 

If you have time, can you also explain how it's ok to ask questions based on no evidence on anything related the Democrats, but claim the myriad reports about the Trump administration's (mis)handling of the Russia investigation (not to mention the substance of the investigation) aren't worth questioning?

 

1. The Washington Post and The New York Times appear to be heavily left slanted. If there is one person that they hate, thats President Trump. I do not know if what they say is 100% factual and neither do you.

 

2. What the Gateway Pundit published that stuck out to me was a public admission by someone who said they had a part in the leaks and helped the deceased in it.

 

3. As far as questioning things that are not fair or unethical from either side, then I think it should be. I have stated numerous times if Trump is guilty then he needs removed. How many times do I have to say that?

 

4. The Democrats proved in the past elections the low level of ethics that they have to the point of down right cheating one of their own. I say Murder is nothing for these people and this is the head of the DNC, the party you support. Those are facts thats been proven.