halfback20 Posted January 16, 2017 Share Posted January 16, 2017 They're just prisoners of the moment. Chad is top 5 all time as far as pure talent goes. All of the other stuff brings him down and rightfully so, but Chad flat out balled until his ego got the best of him. Top 5 all time? You've lost your mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UKMustangFan Posted January 16, 2017 Share Posted January 16, 2017 Go back and watch. Listen to former players talk about him. Listen to former Steelers and Ravens players talk about him. The dude flat out balled. You can view this as me just being a Bengals fan. But watch his highlights man, Chad (the player) was an absolute stud. Yes he was. He just wasn't as good as AB is. And to say he's top 5 all time is ridiculous. If there were ever proof of your bias that statement right there is it. TO Irvin Megatron Moss Rice Wayne Harrison Carter Monk Reed Fitzgerald Chad's better than those guys? To quote Chad, "Child, please". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UKMustangFan Posted January 16, 2017 Share Posted January 16, 2017 AB scores more, gets more yards and catches more TDS. What else could he do to be better? Wear a Bengals uniform.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrantNKY Posted January 16, 2017 Share Posted January 16, 2017 Top 5 all time? You've lost your mind. Talent wise. We are comparing talent here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spindoc Posted January 16, 2017 Share Posted January 16, 2017 They're just prisoners of the moment. Chad is top 5 all time as far as pure talent goes. All of the other stuff brings him down and rightfully so, but Chad flat out balled until his ego got the best of him.You've lost your damn mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
halfback20 Posted January 16, 2017 Share Posted January 16, 2017 Talent wise. We are comparing talent here. You're talking about something very subjective, but very few people will agree with you imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrantNKY Posted January 16, 2017 Share Posted January 16, 2017 Do you all understand what the word talent means? Talent doesn't mean better. Talent means you are capable of doing things that other people can't. Chad could do things that AB couldn't. Just like Aaron Rodgers and Cam Newton can do things that Tom Brady and Peyton Manning couldn't. Doesn't mean Aaron Rodgers and Cam Newton are better than Brady and Manning. Just more talented. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrantNKY Posted January 16, 2017 Share Posted January 16, 2017 You've lost your damn mind.TALENT man. Not top 5 receiver ever. Top 5 most talented. Big difference as I'm trying to explain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spindoc Posted January 16, 2017 Share Posted January 16, 2017 TALENT man. Not top 5 receiver ever. Top 5 most talented. Big difference as I'm trying to explain.Nah, I'm out on this one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
halfback20 Posted January 16, 2017 Share Posted January 16, 2017 TALENT man. Not top 5 receiver ever. Top 5 most talented. Big difference as I'm trying to explain. His previous post still stands. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrantNKY Posted January 16, 2017 Share Posted January 16, 2017 Yes he was. He just wasn't as good as AB is. And to say he's top 5 all time is ridiculous. If there were ever proof of your bias that statement right there is it. TO Irvin Megatron Moss Rice Wayne Harrison Carter Monk Reed Fitzgerald Chad's better than those guys? To quote Chad, "Child, please". I said top 5 most talented. Get it right at least man. To use your list he is more talented than everyone on there except TO, Megatron, Randy Moss(greatest receiver ever), and Jerry Rice. This doesn't mean he is better it means more talented. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UKMustangFan Posted January 16, 2017 Share Posted January 16, 2017 Let's see AB is quicker. AB is a better route runner. AB has better hands. AB is a more physical receiver. AB is more athletic....What exactly is/was Chad better at??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
halfback20 Posted January 16, 2017 Share Posted January 16, 2017 Do you all understand what the word talent means? Talent doesn't mean better. Talent means you are capable of doing things that other people can't. Chad could do things that AB couldn't. Just like Aaron Rodgers and Cam Newton can do things that Tom Brady and Peyton Manning couldn't. Doesn't mean Aaron Rodgers and Cam Newton are better than Brady and Manning. Just more talented. AB can do things Ocho couldn't do. Like catch more passes, for more yards and more TDs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
halfback20 Posted January 16, 2017 Share Posted January 16, 2017 Let's see AB is quicker. AB is a better route runner. AB has better hands. AB is a more physical receiver. AB is more athletic....What exactly is/was Chad better at??? Taller? Being taller? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrantNKY Posted January 16, 2017 Share Posted January 16, 2017 You're talking about something very subjective, but very few people will agree with you imo.AB is slower, shorter, and doesn't have the body control Chad had. It's not that subjective. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts