Fear the Nation Posted December 21, 2016 Posted December 21, 2016 Congress: Obama admin fired top scientist to advance climate change plans | Fox News
Jesse James Posted December 21, 2016 Posted December 21, 2016 A new congressional investigation has determined that the Obama administration fired a top scientist and intimidated staff at the Department of Energy in order to further its climate change agenda, according to a new report that alleges the administration ordered top officials to obstruct Congress in order to forward this agenda.
capt278 Posted December 21, 2016 Posted December 21, 2016 I'm not surprised. Anything to advance an agenda.
Hellcats Posted December 21, 2016 Posted December 21, 2016 :ohbrother: Heaven help our great-grandchildren.
Fear the Nation Posted December 22, 2016 Author Posted December 22, 2016 :ohbrother: Heaven help our great-grandchildren. So the fact that he made the scientist come to a conclusion that the facts didn't or fired them doesn't bother you at all?
Bengal Maniac Posted December 22, 2016 Posted December 22, 2016 So the fact that he made the scientist come to a conclusion that the facts didn't or fired them doesn't bother you at all? If that is true it is wrong. Now let's see if DJT can stand above those that disagree with him and not fire them. We will see and we will see if you respond accordingly.
Fear the Nation Posted December 22, 2016 Author Posted December 22, 2016 If that is true it is wrong. Now let's see if DJT can stand above those that disagree with him and not fire them. We will see and we will see if you respond accordingly. This has nothing to do with Trump. It has to do with the scientific evidence being suppressed and tainted to fit a particular agenda period. There have been so many of these incidents worldwide that when someone says well 99% of scientist say, it's not taken seriously. It's only 99% of scientists who have a political agenda or didn't want to lose their jobs for telling the truth. C'mon man that's bad science all the way around. You cannot come to a conclusion of evidence using false data. This reeks of partisian politics and fake science. In Washington it's business as usual. In the real world it's a scam and you go to jail.
Bengal Maniac Posted December 22, 2016 Posted December 22, 2016 This has nothing to do with Trump. It has to do with the scientific evidence being suppressed and tainted to fit a particular agenda period. There have been so many of these incidents worldwide that when someone says well 99% of scientist say, it's not taken seriously. It's only 99% of scientists who have a political agenda or didn't want to lose their jobs for telling the truth. C'mon man that's bad science all the way around. You cannot come to a conclusion of evidence using false data. This reeks of partisian politics and fake science. In Washington it's business as usual. In the real world it's a scam and you go to jail. Things like this will have something to do with Trump. But I am confident it will be spun differently.
Fear the Nation Posted December 22, 2016 Author Posted December 22, 2016 Things like this will have something to do with Trump. But I am confident it will be spun differently. This is wrong, the left and Obama are doing it. Why do you keep referring to Trump?
Hellcats Posted December 22, 2016 Posted December 22, 2016 The article didn't state this scientist's beliefs. Was he amongst the 3% of scientists who believe climate change is not occurring? If so should have been fired.
Fear the Nation Posted December 22, 2016 Author Posted December 22, 2016 The article didn't state this scientist's beliefs. Was he amongst the 3% of scientists who believe climate change is not occurring? If so should have been fired. Infer that how you want. Did you not read the part about suppressing information, ie scientific data? Fired Top scientist which tells me they weren't incompetent. Obama didn't like where the data took the issue. Didn't fit his agenda.
Bengal Maniac Posted December 22, 2016 Posted December 22, 2016 This is wrong, the left and Obama are doing it. Why do you keep referring to Trump? As I said if as reported it is wrong but do we know the whole story. Now I only want to know if Trump does something like this will you post it. That's all. The unwillingness to answer that leads me to believe you won't.
Hellcats Posted December 22, 2016 Posted December 22, 2016 Infer that how you want. Did you not read the part about suppressing information, ie scientific data? Fired Top scientist which tells me they weren't incompetent. Obama didn't like where the data took the issue. Didn't fit his agenda. What was the data? Was it supported by other top scientists? Just a few unanswered questions.
Fear the Nation Posted December 22, 2016 Author Posted December 22, 2016 As I said if as reported it is wrong but do we know the whole story. Now I only want to know if Trump does something like this will you post it. That's all. The unwillingness to answer that leads me to believe you won't. I want the truth. I want the politics out of the science and let the real true untainted data lead us where it truly leads. Dude, I'm real, not blinded so much by who or why. My core is mine, so I'd call out my momma for being an idiot, so YES I will. Trump better tow a rightous line. I'm sick of how our politics work against We The People. That's all of us.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.