Internet marketing firm refuses service to Republicans

[jericho]

Isn't this the same as the business that refused to make a cake for a gay couple and was fined for it.

 

http://www.kob.com/albuquerque-news/business-owner-refusing-service-president-elect-donald-trump-supporters-matthew-blanchfield-1st-in-seo-internet-marketing-company/4325531/

[Bengal Maniac]

Isn't this the same as the business that refused to make a cake for a gay couple and was fined for it.

 

http://www.kob.com/albuquerque-news/business-owner-refusing-service-president-elect-donald-trump-supporters-matthew-blanchfield-1st-in-seo-internet-marketing-company/4325531/

 

If it is then I assume you have no problem with it.

[Clyde]

No. I don't think party affiliation is a protected class.

[jericho]

No. I don't think party affiliation is a protected class.

 

You mean gays are protected then.

 

Am I protected?

 

So gays have more rights than I do

[jericho]

If it is then I assume you have no problem with it.

I actually don't but isn't this the same precedent as the bakery faced?

Are you allowed to turn down someone based on belief.

[Clyde]

You mean gays are protected then.

 

Am I protected?

 

So gays have more rights than I do

 

Yes. You are protected.

[OlDog75]

This crap is just silly.

[FarBeyondDriven]

The free market will work......the wizard of smart just eliminated about 50% of his potential clients.

[jericho]

Yes. You are protected.

 

I must not be since that guy won't take my business since I'm a Trump voter but he takes Hillary supporters business.

[Clyde]

I must not be since that guy won't take my business since I'm a Trump voter but he takes Hillary supporters business.

 

 

You're protected as a white, heterosexual (presumably ), Christian male.

[jericho]

You're protected as a white, heterosexual (presumably ), Christian male.

 

Don't presume, I enjoy women only.

Hahahaha

[Jesse James]

Dont bother me in the least. Its his business. I would just laugh and take my business elsewhere.

 

But after reading the article a little closer his quote really makes one wonder how he might not end up in court. I assume he is the high justice of Morality and Justice. One could say the bakers had a moral obligation to not serve either based on what they believe the definition of morality was.This is a slippery slope. Seems alot like the same thing to me. See quote below.

 

 

" In an interview with KOB Tuesday, Blanchfield said he has a moral obligation to stand up for what he believes is right and against injustice."

[jericho]

^^^^^^

Yeah but since he is an obvious nut job liberal it's okay to discriminate. It's either the liberal way is right or nothing is.

[Jesse James]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X77K_zeZUu4

[jericho]

Well that guy just proves in the interview that he isn't an idiot.

 

It also proves the lack of intolerance liberals have while they try to preach tolerance for what they believe.