Disclaimer, since apparently it isn't obvious to some, there are two sides to the story, and we've only heard one.

 

Let's for a second assume it happened the way it's alleged in the suit.

 

What in the suit could cause problems for the officers?

If Plantmanky spent the night at your house and the police showed up to arrest him the next day, receiving a tip that he was at your house...it is of very little concern to you as far as the police are concerned. Once Plantmanky exited your house and went outside it would be of even less concern to you as far as the police are concerned...the fact that you are his parent, friend or business partner wouldn't matter since he is an adult. If the police don't enter your house, as far as they are concerned you don't matter and you should keep to yourself and let them do their job of arresting Plantmanky.

 

If they're on my property, what they're doing there is absolutely my concern.

 

And there isn't a chance in hell plantman would be at my house. :lol2:

My last question was about the Dad getting arrested. Where did they have a warrant for his arrest? In the suit it says the Dad was in the home still when he was physically removed from the house and arrested.

 

If he is standing just inside his home but being loud/obscene/causing a disturbance that would potentially affect others in a public place, getting arrested is one possibility.

If Plantmanky spent the night at your house and the police showed up to arrest him the next day, receiving a tip that he was at your house...it is of very little concern to you as far as the police are concerned. Once Plantmanky exited your house and went outside it would be of even less concern to you as far as the police are concerned...the fact that you are his parent, friend or business partner wouldn't matter since he is an adult. If the police don't enter your house, as far as they are concerned you don't matter and you should keep to yourself and let them do their job of arresting Plantmanky.

 

We must have went to a Reds game together.

Clearly. What's the point of these threads if we can't comment based on what's posted though? If we had to wait for both sides of every issue to come out, this site would serve zero purpose. What's the point of a discussion board that doesn't want discussion?

 

I can not think of any law stating the police have to tell a 24 year olds mommy why he's being arrested. Can't think of one that says they have to tell her the truth either.

So if he would have asked to see it they should have showed him?

 

He will get a copy of it eventually. They don't have to show it to him or anyone right away.

I can not think of any law stating the police have to tell a 24 year olds mommy why he's being arrested. Can't think of one that says they have to tell her the truth either.

 

Cool.

 

I was asking the questions because I didn't know the answers.

My last question was about the Dad getting arrested. Where did they have a warrant for his arrest? In the suit it says the Dad was in the home still when he was physically removed from the house and arrested.

A warrant is issued in most case to arrest someone that commits a crime out of view of law enforcement. In this case if the father committed and arrestable offense in front of them, they wouldn't need a warrant to arrest him...I don't believe.

The suit says he was still inside the home when they arrested him. If that were the case, I'd say that's going to cause problems for the officers, wouldn't it?

 

Officers, believe it or not, can arrest you in your home if you break the law.

He will get a copy of it eventually. They don't have to show it to him or anyone right away.

 

So hypothetically an officer could go up to anyone and tell them they have a warrant for their arrest and not have to produce said warrant?

Officers, believe it or not, can arrest you in your home if you break the law.

 

Obviously.

 

Again, I'm going off what is in the suit. If all he did was tell them to let go of his wife and instruct his neighbor to record the incident, does that constitute an arrest?

They said the warrant was for assault and fleeing. It was for unpaid court costs.

 

Probably unpaid court costs on the charges of assault and fleeing.

A warrant is issued in most case to arrest someone that commits a crime out of view of law enforcement. In this case if the father committed and arrestable offense in front of them, they wouldn't need a warrant to arrest him...I don't believe.

 

Based on what the suit alleges his actions were, does it appear he committed a crime?

So hypothetically an officer could go up to anyone and tell them they have a warrant for their arrest and not have to produce said warrant?

 

Yes. You will get a copy eventually.

Probably unpaid court costs on the charges of assault and fleeing.

 

Are those considered one in the same, or is it a separate matter altogether? I'd assume it's separate, but maybe it's not.