I would take Mckim from St. X over any of these guys. He had defenders draped over him every game and shot 41%. Every time I watched him the 3's were borderline NBA range every time.

Need to add Connor Maddox from Augusta. No idea why they didn't file stats but he's as good as anybody statistically. Well over 40% and averaged 4+ per game.

Need to add Connor Maddox from Augusta. No idea why they didn't file stats but he's as good as anybody statistically. Well over 40% and averaged 4+ per game.

 

Shame on the school for not posting stats!

I would take Mckim from St. X over any of these guys. He had defenders draped over him every game and shot 41%. Every time I watched him the 3's were borderline NBA range every time.

 

Why was he taking shots so deep? Take the higher % shots.

Why was he taking shots so deep? Take the higher % shots.

 

It's all about looking/being flashy. I'm not saying specifically this kid, but kids in general.

Why was he taking shots so deep? Take the higher % shots.

 

I guess I did not articulate my point very well. 41% from 3 pt range is very good. The makeup of his team forced him to take shots from deep range. I was trying to say he has the ability to shoot off the dribble from deep while being guarded. Most high % 3 point shooters are stand still shooters who must be set up by their teammates.

It's all about looking/being flashy. I'm not saying specifically this kid, but kids in general.

 

Or that is what the defense gives them? Good shooters are not going to get 3's up on the line. If they can still shoot a good % from deeper than it is okay for them to shoot them.

Or that is what the defense gives them? Good shooters are not going to get 3's up on the line. If they can still shoot a good % from deeper than it is okay for them to shoot them.

 

Likely a combination of the 2.