They wouldn't beat any of the WNBA teams. Did you watch the final game of maryland vs. duke. It was played at an extremely high level.

Lex. Cath girls could beat some boys teams in the state

 

 

They were playing against girls though.

DIII, DII, DI, it doesn't matter. Compared to any high school team its a totally different level of intensity in either one of the D's with cream of the crop athletes giving 110% every time they lace up and step foot on the floor, practice or tourney time. PT is always earned there.

 

Here's one for you. Politics shouldn't put players on the floor. Now there's a stinky can of worms. You know what I mean. Athleticism and hard work ethic should always dictate, but from training league through 12th its always sad to watch it happen.

 

No shot clock. Another reason why high school ball is so much less intense than any of the DI-III level programs. When you gain a possession you better have something in mind to do with it. Therefore it would be extremely hard for any HS team to walk in and come close to competing with a D team who's moving the game at another pace with this in mind. It clearly changes the strategy of the entire game. From another thread, I still say lets turn on the shot clock from 9th thru 12th grade, just in case there might be one who goes to the next level.

I saw ALC beat Oak Hill when they had Stackhouse.

 

Actually, I think that they normally destroyed the ALC J.V. team but had difficulty against the ALC varsity team. At least that's how it went when I was at Alice Lloyd.

I really can't figure out what is the worst part of this thread looking thru all of the post of people actually trying to compare all of the different teams college and high school boys and girls basketball teams who could win. Then to bring in the WNBA the old saying apples to oranges we will never know because they will never play.