Who wins and why?

 

The match is played at Scott on Tuesday @ 8pm

Scott wins 4-2 in a wild one.

3-1 Scott

If Campbell is smart, they pack it in and man-mark both Treadway and Schneider the entire game. Try to get an over the top goal or go for PK's.

If Campbell can play a game like they played against CovCath, they can beat Scott. Scott is favored but CCHS could pull out the win. First upset of the districts?? I like the idea of man marking those two....everyone knows how they can get if frustrated.

If Campbell can play a game like they played against CovCath, they can beat Scott. Scott is favored but CCHS could pull out the win. First upset of the districts?? I like the idea of man marking those two....everyone knows how they can get if frustrated.

 

Exactly, keep them frustrated and make someone else beat you.........because there isn't a whole lot of scoring other than those two. Packing it in also negates the long ball.

I hope it doesn't go to PKs, it's a terrible way to win/lose. At that stage it's partly luck... Will the keeper move the right way... Will the pressure mess with the strikers head.. I hope it's decided in regulation.

I agree with you let them end on the field in regular or over time play.

I hope it doesn't go to PKs, it's a terrible way to win/lose. At that stage it's partly luck... Will the keeper move the right way... Will the pressure mess with the strikers head.. I hope it's decided in regulation.

 

Agreed, not a good thing for either team.

Treadway didn't even play in their meeting during the regular season when the Eagles won 4-1. Not to mention, two of their goals came from players other than Schneider. If 17 assists and 9 goals is "not a whole lot of offense" than I would like to know how much more Morgan needs to contribute to be mentioned here...

Edited October 14, 201411 yr by Randy Parker
Rule 2

Treadway didn't even play in their meeting during the regular season when the Eagles won 4-1. Not to mention, two of their goals came from players other than Schneider. If 17 assists and 9 goals is "not a whole lot of offense" than I would like to know how much more Morgan needs to contribute to be mentioned here...

 

People are just stating their opinions about the upcoming match. To come on here and call people ignorant is pretty low on your part. You could have just commented with Morgan's stats and that would have said enough. Instead you had to go where no one expected this thread to go.

Edited October 14, 201411 yr by Randy Parker

Hardly...

When Scott is the number one talked about team in the soccer forum, which is no question, the amount of purely ignorant statements made are shameful to see. Morgan's statistics are numbers that cannot be argued with.

Assists don't really mean a lot. Some schools schools don't even record them properly. Also, if you look at some of Scott's weak competition... It's no wonder goals and assists mounted up. Just because Scott has been "the most talked about team" on this forum doesn't mean it has been all good.

Morgan is very good and plays a big role for Scott. I think Dumaine has to negate Morgan in midfield if Camels are to be at all successful, which would require a more defensive set than normal. Augspurger will be good for at least one, maybe two, goals for the Camels, but if they don't set their mind to defending Scott will score 4 or more. I'm sticking with 4-2 Scott.

Yes, Morgan is good, and an important player for Scott, no doubt about that. I didn't mean otherwise. I was just keeping it real as regards some of the competition they played. I do think Scott will win by a couple of goals.