March 27, 201412 yr Yeah, because that's comparable. Seriously, how does anyone have an issue with "No date rape" or "no assaulting women"? I know a lot of people who would view it the same way, yes. I have no problem with rules that are about treating others with respect, but in my opinion mandating monogamy it's our of bounds.
March 27, 201412 yr BYU has already demonstrated that it can. Exactly, so why did you single out the public schools but seemed to think it was OK for the Privates
March 27, 201412 yr Some schools have a dress code for players on road trips or game day..."Who are they to tell me how to dress?" Ram do you have a problem with that?
March 27, 201412 yr I know a lot of people who would view it the same way, yes. I have no problem with rules that are about treating others with respect, but in my opinion mandating monogamy it's our of bounds. I would imagine if the chick was okay with them having multiple "partners" it would be cool. The whole basis of the rules is to treat women with respect.
March 27, 201412 yr Exactly, so why did you single out the public schools but seemed to think it was OK for the Privates Because public schools aren't religious institutions. Religious schools can have whatever stupid rule they want. Other private schools that you mentioned, like Stanford, would never publicly advertise a rule enforcing monogamy, because plenty of their students would lose it.
March 27, 201412 yr I would imagine if the chick was okay with them having multiple "partners" it would be cool. The whole basis of the rules is to treat women with respect. That's not what it says. I'm responding to the rule as written.
March 27, 201412 yr Some schools have a dress code for players on road trips or game day..."Who are they to tell me how to dress?" Ram do you have a problem with that? I don't, because they're still on the clock, so to speak.
March 27, 201412 yr You against curfews too Ram? Players should be allowed to stay up as late as they want, right?
March 27, 201412 yr You against curfews too Ram? Players should be allowed to stay up as late as they want, right? Enforcing who a player can and cannot date is what I have a problem with.
March 27, 201412 yr Enforcing who a player can and cannot date is what I have a problem with. Must have missed that rule....We are reading the rules as written, are we not?
March 27, 201412 yr Must have missed that rule....We are reading the rules as written, are we not? It's the last one one the list, if you missed it (which I know you didn't...)
March 27, 201412 yr It's the last one one the list, if you missed it (which I know you didn't...) Doesn't say anything about restricting who a player is allowed to date. Remember, we're simply discussing the rules as they are written.
March 27, 201412 yr So Ram, a co-worker of yours (off the clock of course) is filmed making hateful, racial comments. Your boss finds out about it. He fires him. You'd stick up for said co-worker, because after all, it wasn't on the company's time that he made the comments?
March 27, 201412 yr If who is plural, it sure does affect it. Ram said we have to read the rule as it's written. Nowhere in the rule he cited (the last one) does it use the word "who" at all. Now if he wants to complain about a rule restricting how many people a player can date at one time, have at it.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.