Yet it won't happen.......and we have to hear how dominant they are......we are not quite up to their level........

 

 

I want to say this....unless we lose, in state, you can not convince me, that BGHS is better.....

 

 

* - sidenote = bring it

Yet it won't happen.......and we have to hear how dominant they are......we are not quite up to their level........

 

 

I want to say this....unless we lose, in state, you can not convince me, that BGHS is better.....

 

 

* - sidenote = bring it

 

Then it's a shame that it boils down to 2, maybe 3 shots by 1 or 2 teams to do it. Trinity is only playing district or other 6A teams in the playoffs. For the purposes of debate, it is a shame they aren't playing for definitive proof, but you've given an EXTREMELY narrow field with which your mind can be changed. We'll see how it all plays out. I expected you'd beat X more handily. I'd guess you did too.

Then it's a shame that it boils down to 2, maybe 3 shots by 1 or 2 teams to do it. Trinity is only playing district or other 6A teams in the playoffs. For the purposes of debate, it is a shame they aren't playing for deifnitive, but you've given an EXTREMELY narrow field with which your mind can be changed. We'll see how it all plays out. I expected you'd beat X more handily. I'd guess you did too.

tonight? No...I didn't it's rivalry....we've now won 7 straight...against, arguably the what? 2nd, 3rd, 4th, best team in state? There's no other team in our state that can say that.....

Yet it won't happen.......and we have to hear how dominant they are......we are not quite up to their level........

 

 

I want to say this....unless we lose, in state, you can not convince me, that BGHS is better.....

 

 

* - sidenote = bring it

 

 

If your beating a St. Xavier team missing their best player by 12 when Bowling Green beat them worse with him playing, there's not really a lot that's going to change your mind.

 

Maybe you "have to hear" everyone talking about how good they are because they're just that good.

If your beating a St. Xavier team missing their best player by 8 when Bowling Green beat them worse with him playing, there's not really a lot that's going to change your mind.

 

Maybe you "have to hear" everyone talking about how good they are because they're just that good.

 

Maybe my math skills differ......we won by 12......

Maybe my math skills differ......we won by 12......

 

Sorry, typo. I fixed it. Thanks though.

And Bowling Green still beat them worse and seemed to be in control for much more of the game. They absolutely blew their doors off in the first half. And that was with a healthy Walker.

tonight? No...I didn't it's rivalry....we've now won 7 straight...against, arguably the what? 2nd, 3rd, 4th, best team in state? There's no other team in our state that can say that.....

 

Bowling Green of course doesn't play them twice a year, but has beaten them three in a row now, and Trinity only has an extra year on them in that respect (2010).

 

I submit this to you - if Trinity loses to any of the 6A teams they play this year, it proves that they were not only not #1, they weren't even #2. That's why I think it's a little bit silly a concept, that it has to be a Kentucky team to beat them for you to have your mind changed. When in reality the only Kentucky team that likely could beat either they've both already beaten. And Trinity fans have a ready made excuse for any margin differences - it's a rivalry therefore it doesn't matter that they were less impressive.

Hey, whatever it takes to make some feel better......

 

 

* - X is the "worst" team we've played to date

* - Trinity is the best team they've played to date

 

What happened?

Bowling Green of course doesn't play them twice a year, but has beaten them three in a row now, and Trinity only has an extra year on them in that respect (2010).

 

I submit this to you - if Trinity loses to any of the 6A teams they play this year, it proves that they were not only not #1, they weren't even #2. That's why I think it's a little bit silly a concept, that it has to be a Kentucky team to beat them for you to have your mind changed. When in reality the only Kentucky team that likely could beat either they've both already beaten. And Trinity fans have a ready made excuse for any margin differences - it's a rivalry therefore it doesn't matter that they were less impressive.

 

Who is the best team that has played ANY team in KY?

We won't be beat in KY.....not anytime soon.

Who is the best team that has played ANY team in KY?

 

I guess Ensworth? Then Colerain? I'm not trying to take away Trinity's strength of schedule and say just because they've lost that they are automatically behind Bowling Green.

Hey, whatever it takes to make some feel better......

 

 

* - X is the "worst" team we've played to date

* - Trinity is the best team they've played to date

 

What happened?

 

Disagree. Bowling Green is the best team they've played to date.

I have no reason to sit and dump on Trinity.

 

Last year, I was singing their praises as the best team in the state. I have said numerous times this year that I'm glad they accomplished what they did in the previous years by putting Kentucky football in the national spotlight. Apparently because I think Bowling Green is the best team in the state this year, I have some type of agenda?

I have no reason to sit and dump on Trinity.

 

Last year, I was singing their praises as the best team in the state. I have said numerous times this year that I'm glad they accomplished what they did in the previous years by putting Kentucky football in the national spotlight. Apparently because I think Bowling Green is the best team in the state this year, I have some type of agenda?

All I ask, is why? Is BG #1 in the state? What have they done?