HIM

The buck sweep is primarily a boundary run that is very successful in today's game, so I would have to strongly disagree with you. I don't advocate running the ball on 3rd and 7 often but if I am the buck sweep is one of my go to plays and that is a boundary call.

It is easier to win games with D1 players, there is no correlation on rather or not a D1 player is easy to coach or not.

Could be better for both the coach and the school. Hard for a home grown product to do well, and be what is expected of him in his own community.

150 plays with 10 special teams plays or even 20 is still putting both teams at 60-70 offensive plays which is simply outrageous and not reachable. The rule difference in college has nothing to do with it, you are still talking about 5 full minutes per quarter which is 20 minuets a game longer which far exceeds the amount of times someone goes out of bounds.

Are you tracking these plays? I have a hard time believing that JV teams are going faster than Clemson, Auburn and almost at the same warp speed as Oregon but doing it at 10 minute quarters... seems simply mind boggling considering Oregon is only averaging 78.4 plays, Clemson at 80, and Auburn at 70 of offense a game in 15 minute quarters. I just don't see how jv teams are going 150 plays in 8-10 minute quarters, when we have the most brilliant up tempo minds averaging less plays per minute than JV teams

Would be a terrible idea, look at the possessions teams get in JV games. If you get behind you may as well head to the bus because you are not coming back in a game, I wish the quarters were longer if anything.

If you are not from the mountains, that is not a job a coach from anywhere else in the state would consider.

What is the All A Classic, I am not familiar with this?

Noel Devine is one of the most electric high school players in the history of the sport and his team never even had a winning record and he could pick any D1 school in the country to play at. Plenty of schools put out D1 and NFL players and never win games. Anyone who has ever coached or truly been around the game besides just a fan knows that recruiting is far less about stats and much more about measurables and tangibles. How many kids move on to D1 or the NFL should have no bearing on how good a program is at all, in fact it should be the other way around, how many titles can you win without elite D1 talent or NFL talent.

We are still only talking about Boyle for some reason, when I mentioned Male as well, but if we are going to stay on Boyle that is fine. Corbin with wins and loses in the state championships still only matches the amount of titles that Boyle has has, to me it's a no brainer which team should be ranked higher, because district title pale in comparison to winning the entire state championship. After that point getting to the big game, and winning the big game are also different. One team has done that 7 out of 8 try's while Corbin has done it 3 out of 7 times. I respect the heck out of Corbin I just don't respect the heck out of district titles, what I respect is winning the championship and I will go back to the NFC East. I have no respect for any of the teams that win that division. Some teams can win district championship after championship playing little competition. Now this is a good argument and if SW were to win 7 more titles giving them 8 championships, I would consider them the better program even in the watered down 6 class system.

I think 1 state title is worth more than 3-5 district titles easily yes, even though 1 state title could be a little flukey. You start compounding multiple state titles like 5-7 even if it is in a short period and I would take that over 30 district titles any day, but that's just my opinion.

Coach Smith came in 1992 not 1997

I think that's a broad brush you are painting with, because to me I simply value state titles significantly higher than anything else. I think extremely high of the Corbin program, I just think Male is easily one of the top 10 programs in the state history off titles alone even if they were bad in the 80's same with Boyle, or Highlands, or BG, Danville, Belfry, Trinity, X. While I am sure I am leaving someone out, those are the teams I think of when I think of a top 10, and to not have Male in there is crazy and I would say the same for Boyle as well.

I wish I had the time, but bringing up talking points doesn't really mean I need to make my own thread. Some people need some thicker skin.

I understand completely what you are saying, so I am bringing up a different argument, do titles matter more than district championships? This system seems to value good seasons over Great seasons, as long as you had a long run of good seasons. It's kind of like the argument for Notre Dame football, yes they won a lot of championships 30+ years ago, but what about the now, would teams like Oregon not be considered top 10 programs because they came a long recently and have dominated, instead of having average success over a large margin of years?