So let's say he leaves it up to the states to decide. Good enough?

 

I think that would be the best option either way.

Wouldn't the more effective use of the time and money of the pro-life groups be to shape the message of it as opposed to coming off like a bunch of shock jocks/judgemental jerks regarding the loss of a prenatal life?

 

A couple of years ago Tim Tebow(whom I admittedly loathe) was in a commercial with his mother saying "Thanks mom for choosing life" since her doctor recommended she terminate the pregnancy due to the risk. I think framing it that way is waaaay more effective AND plays a more positive note than the constant negativity about abortion coming from the right. If they spent as much time on that as they do their current methods then it would make a much bigger impact.

 

There are probably a lot of things that could be done to help spread the pro-life cause and convince more people to consider it. I'm just of the opinion that the first thing that should be done is to have the practice outlawed.

 

So let's say he leaves it up to the states to decide. Good enough?

 

Technically, that's how it is now, if I'm not mistaken. For me, taking an innocent life is taking an innocent life...regardless of whether that life is inside or outside of the womb.

You're not voting for yourself?

:lol: :lol:

 

Vegas isn't including write-ins. I may be too much for even the Libertarians.

There are probably a lot of things that could be done to help spread the pro-life cause and convince more people to consider it. I'm just of the opinion that the first thing that should be done is to have the practice outlawed.

 

 

 

Technically, that's how it is now, if I'm not mistaken. For me, taking an innocent life is taking an innocent life...regardless of whether that life is inside or outside of the womb.

 

To the first point, I don't think you will ever see that happen in your time unless you try to win over the hearts and minds of those who are undecided. Heavy handed tactics are a waste of time.

If nuclear isn't in his policy then he isn't truly green.

Doesn't say either way.

:lol: :lol:

 

Vegas isn't including write-ins. I may be too much for even the Libertarians.

 

As your campaign chief, I was thinking we were trying to get you on the ballot. Did I miss a memo?

RP,

 

Is abortion the only social issue you don't agree with Johnson on?

As your campaign chief, I was thinking we were trying to get you on the ballot. Did I miss a memo?

We may need to form a party. Or even better yet, resurect Freak Power!

 

 

To the first point, I don't think you will ever see that happen in your time unless you try to win over the hearts and minds of those who are undecided. Heavy handed tactics are a waste of time.

 

You may be right. And you're sounding an awful lot like George W. Bush. He was always fond of saying that abortion laws will change "when the hearts of American people change."

:lol: :lol:

 

Vegas isn't including write-ins. I may be too much for even the Libertarians.

 

Can't get on the Freak Power ticket?!

RP,

 

Is abortion the only social issue you don't agree with Johnson on?

 

I don't agree with him on gay marriage at all, but that's not a deal-breaker like abortion is for me.

Looks like we just posted that at the same time. :lol:

We may need to form a party. Or even better yet, resurect Freak Power!

 

 

[ATTACH=CONFIG]35309[/ATTACH]

 

Well done! :lol:

Looks like we just posted that at the same time. :lol:

:lol: :lol:

 

I believe they'd have me and probably really the only place I'd belong.

I don't agree with him on gay marriage at all, but that's not a deal-breaker like abortion is for me.

I have another question but I'm going to move it to it's own thread. That way I'm not guilty of driving my own thread so far off the cliff that we can't come back.

 

Cool?