November 25, 200817 yr They were never more than mediocre. Slash was probably the best part of the band, without him it would be foolish to expect anything better than their previous mediocre work.
November 26, 200817 yr They were never more than mediocre. Slash was probably the best part of the band, without him it would be foolish to expect anything better than their previous mediocre work. Mediocre? Where u alive in the 80's in their hey day? Slash is the man, but you gotta give Axl credit has a frontman.....
November 26, 200817 yr Mediocre? Where u alive in the 80's in their hey day? Slash is the man, but you gotta give Axl credit has a frontman..... I'll give him credit for being neurotic, self-important, paranoid and boorish, that's about it. They got lucky with their timing is about all I'll give GR. They came along at a time when people had gotten sick of hair metal, they were slightly different (although I've always thought of them as on par with Poison, Winger, etc.) and that was enough to snow unsuspecting hard rockers. It wasn't the Sex Pistols, but G'n'R, in fact, who pulled the great rock'n'roll swindle.
November 26, 200817 yr I'll give him credit for being neurotic, self-important, paranoid and boorish, that's about it. They got lucky with their timing is about all I'll give GR. They came along at a time when people had gotten sick of hair metal, they were slightly different (although I've always thought of them as on par with Poison, Winger, etc.) and that was enough to snow unsuspecting hard rockers. It wasn't the Sex Pistols, but G'n'R, in fact, who pulled the great rock'n'roll swindle. I took the bait.I know you have been waiting for someone to defend gnr so you can could get on your musical high horse and preach to us that gnr history lesson. Thanks
November 26, 200817 yr I took the bait.I know you have been waiting for someone to defend gnr so you can could get on your musical high horse and preach to us that gnr history lesson. Thanks I calls 'em likes I sees 'em.
November 26, 200817 yr The posters who say that they will not be same without Slash, Izzy and so on probably could not tell if they played on the album or not without reading the credits.
November 26, 200817 yr I'll give him credit for being neurotic, self-important, paranoid and boorish, that's about it. They got lucky with their timing is about all I'll give GR. They came along at a time when people had gotten sick of hair metal, they were slightly different (although I've always thought of them as on par with Poison, Winger, etc.) and that was enough to snow unsuspecting hard rockers. It wasn't the Sex Pistols, but G'n'R, in fact, who pulled the great rock'n'roll swindle. Based on what?
November 26, 200817 yr Based on what? The fact that Axl is a no-talent hack, and is much more style than substance. Oh yeah, and his singing sounds like yowling cats. Ugh.
November 27, 200817 yr I love Guns+Roses. I think it should be false advertisemnt if Duff+Slash aren't in the band. Steven Adler is on Celebrity Rehab so to me it's a joke they call it Guns and Roses (I know he was kicked out). It's not the same when they all aren't together. That's like Slash without Axel trying to use the name. I would like to here the albumn though.
November 27, 200817 yr IMO The only reason they are using the name G-N-R so they can fool people into buying the album...I'm actually shocked that Axl with his arrogance that He didn't use his name as the band name...Maybe he realized that no one would give it a chance if he didn't use G-N-R...:rolleyes:I really doubt that he realized that:D,but I would be willing to bet the record company's knew a Axl Rose album would not do good...:thumb:
November 27, 200817 yr I like what Ive heard of the album. I have to agree with stick1 that I like the original band better? I wonder what the chances are for a reunion of the original band and possible tour? It would be a huge sellout in my opinion.
November 27, 200817 yr The fact that Axl is a no-talent hack, and is much more style than substance. Oh yeah, and his singing sounds like yowling cats. Ugh. Saying he has no talent is not a fact, but opinion. Just like in my opinion someone who can play a piano has talent.
November 27, 200817 yr IMO The only reason they are using the name G-N-R so they can fool people into buying the album...I'm actually shocked that Axl with his arrogance that He didn't use his name as the band name...Maybe he realized that no one would give it a chance if he didn't use G-N-R...:rolleyes:I really doubt that he realized that:D,but I would be willing to bet the record company's knew a Axl Rose album would not do good...:thumb: The name GNR is left over from when Axl and Traci Gunns formed a band.
November 27, 200817 yr The fact that Axl is a no-talent hack, and is much more style than substance. Oh yeah, and his singing sounds like yowling cats. Ugh. What about the Sex Pistols?
November 29, 200817 yr Saying he has no talent is not a fact, but opinion. Just like in my opinion someone who can play a piano has talent. OK, I'll bite. His talent is in no way, shape or form commensurate with the record sales he puzzlingly enjoyed. What about the Sex Pistols? I don't recall them ever claiming to be great musicians. Axl, on the other hand, has an ego that far outpaces the quality of music he produced. In his own words, from a stupid MTV gag where viewers could "win" his domicile: "You can have the pad; I'm keepin' my aura." Axl cornered the market on pretentiousness.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.