Is there really a difference? They're still not making the playoffs and contending for a title.

 

Let's see they won the division is 2005 and contended for playoff a playoff spot in 2006 ... what a memory.

Keep him...The longer Marvin is in Cincy, the longer you dont have to worry about the Bengals winning the North.

 

Yeah, three years ago seems like a long time :laugh:

Let's see they won the division is 2005 and contended for playoff a playoff spot in 2006 ... what a memory.

 

You asked if we wanted the losing days of the 90's or .500 ball. IMO, there is no difference.

Bratowski's offense is so predictable that the system has become a joke. Did anyone in the stadium think on 4th and 1 with the game on the line the Bengals weren't going to run Perry up the gut? Marvin is a defensive 'guru' who can't seem to improve the defense in all these years in Cincy.

Bratowski's offense is so predictable that the system has become a joke. Did anyone in the stadium think on 4th and 1 with the game on the line the Bengals weren't going to run Perry up the gut? Marvin is a defensive 'guru' who can't seem to improve the defense in all these years in Cincy.

 

Should have kicked the FG

You asked if we wanted the losing days of the 90's or .500 ball. IMO, there is no difference.

 

Um, OK.

Let's see they won the division is 2005 and contended for playoff a playoff spot in 2006 ... what a memory.

 

If you look at the tenure of Mike Brown, 2005 was a complete aberation. Something about a blind owner finding a winning team.

Man, you got me there.