I know it's not your system so don't take it personally. However, you and Wireman keep saying this system hasn't lost and that's very deciving to say the least. If I were a millionaire and went to the casino everyday and decided that I was going to make a $1000 everyday I could do it. I'd go to a roulette and bet on on Black, double up if I lost, until I won $1000. It might take 1 try, it might take 10 trys but I'll win $1000 everyday. To go around saying that I have a system to beat Roulette would be a joke.

 

Nobody is forcing you to play the system. I can't really complain about a system that is 70-0 and +70 units.

I know it's not your system so don't take it personally. However, you and Wireman keep saying this system hasn't lost and that's very deciving to say the least. If I were a millionaire and went to the casino everyday and decided that I was going to make a $1000 everyday I could do it. I'd go to a roulette and bet on on Black, double up if I lost, until I won $1000. It might take 1 try, it might take 10 trys but I'll win $1000 everyday. To go around saying that I have a system to beat Roulette would be a joke.

 

You don't just randomly pick a team and play them till they lose. You have to have a road trip and the team can't be in the top 5 ATS. Thats a little different than red or black.

Nobody is forcing you to play the system. I can't really complain about a system that is 70-0 and +70 units.

 

My roulette system is better, it will never lose. You can't say never on yours. Like I said before, you could use this same system and start the bets on teams that are on 3 or 4 game ATS streaks (or anything else for that matter) and bet until you win and claim it doesn't lose.

 

Just for fun, I'm going to try and track it for the rest of the year if I have time to. I'll report back at the end of the year.

You don't just randomly pick a team and play them till they lose. You have to have a road trip and the team can't be in the top 5 ATS. Thats a little different than red or black.

 

Not really. I read the "system" and it's not really much different. That's why Vegas sets a line, to make it 50-50 bet. They know whose at home and whose on the road and whose hot and whose not.

I'm not really sure what you are trying to prove here? You asked me to post it I did. You don't like it don't play it. I will glady take the +50 units I am up on it.

I'm not really sure what you are trying to prove here? You asked me to post it I did. You don't like it don't play it. I will glady take the +50 units I am up on it.

 

No big deal. We're just arguing the wording of it. It will make you money, obviously. I just was contesting the fact that it "never" loses. The "system" as a whole may not but you're going to lose a lot of bets along the way. Same as my roulette example, that millionaire will claim that has a system that will never lose at roulette.

For the record, after my initial research of the schedule and tracking it from the All-Star Break to the end of the season, it's 1-0 with a push and Sacramento playing Orlando right now. As part of my research, I my give it a try myself in small amounts. The only thing that worries me in the 4, 5, or 6 game sweep on a road trip. I know it's not likely but you can never say never. And if you bail out after 3 games, you just lost almost 8 units.

I had a good day hitting Xavier -5 and Wisconsin -2. Would've had a great day if Pitt didn't hit that 25 footer to push Louisville -2.

My mistake, I had posted earlier that I took Xavier -6.5... That was incorrect, it was -4.5 (thankfully)..

 

I'm 2-0 and I've got the under in the Stanford/Cal game (139.5)...

I had Wisconsin thanks to you Hangman. Only bet I made today.

My roulette system is better, it will never lose. You can't say never on yours. Like I said before, you could use this same system and start the bets on teams that are on 3 or 4 game ATS streaks (or anything else for that matter) and bet until you win and claim it doesn't lose.

 

Just for fun, I'm going to try and track it for the rest of the year if I have time to. I'll report back at the end of the year.

 

1) Its not my system.

 

2) You might not be able to say never, but its now 72-0 on the season.

1) Its not my system.

 

2) You might not be able to say never, but its now 72-0 on the season.

 

Like I said to HT, that's the only thing were really debating is the wording. Sure, it's 72-0 but do you know what is it's actual record on games that you would have had to bet to get there?

And as I mentioned I may give it a try while I track it. The Orlando over Sacramento game looked good last night anyway--if I took NBA games more often but I rarely do. There's not another opportunity until March 2 and then several on March 4.

Like I said to HT, that's the only thing were really debating is the wording. Sure, it's 72-0 but do you know what is it's actual record on games that you would have had to bet to get there?

And as I mentioned I may give it a try while I track it. The Orlando over Sacramento game looked good last night anyway--if I took NBA games more often but I rarely do. There's not another opportunity until March 2 and then several on March 4.

 

In a system, you don't keep track of the individual games - you just keep track of the system. I haven't heard of any other systems going undefeated for an entire season. Have you? If so, please share.