Jump to content

HOF.....baseball...who's not in, that you think should?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 77
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I've never understood, why Dawson wasn't it. If I recall correctly, he was MVP on a last place team.

 

His offensive stats while impressive, was not his strongest argument. His arm, kept many runners from advancing the extra base and scoring.

 

Dawson and Jim Rice, should be in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a shame that the writers have punished these guys for not being media-friendly. If they're going to do that to two players who I think were among the top OFs for their era, then fair's fair, they should do it to Bonds, should've done it to Steve Carlton, and a few others. If Rice and Dawson played today, they'd be in the 550-600 range for HRs, given how crummy the pitching is today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a shame that the writers have punished these guys for not being media-friendly. If they're going to do that to two players who I think were among the top OFs for their era, then fair's fair, they should do it to Bonds, should've done it to Steve Carlton, and a few others. If Rice and Dawson played today, they'd be in the 550-600 range for HRs, given how crummy the pitching is today.
Don't mean to get off topic but is this an answer, for some exorbitant HR totals over the last 6-8 years.

 

How many years, did Lynn play, to get back on topic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't mean to get off topic but is this an answer, for some exorbitant HR totals over the last 6-8 years.

 

I'm willing to go back the last 15 years; since the Rockies/D-Backs/Marlins/D-Rays came into the league and watered down the pitching. You could almost make a case to go back to '77 when Toronto and Seattle came in, but I don't really think that hurt the overall pitching to the point that it inflated the numbers. An examination of the leaderboards in the individual stats seem to bear this out.

 

And performance enhancers have only compounded the problem, IMO.

 

How many years, did Lynn play, to get back on topic.

 

17 years total

 

Fred Lynn

 

He was an excellent defensive player, however, so he gets points in that column, but not enough to get him in on my ballot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm willing to go back the last 15 years; since the Rockies/D-Backs/Marlins/D-Rays came into the league and watered down the pitching. You could almost make a case to go back to '77 when Toronto and Seattle came in, but I don't really think that hurt the overall pitching to the point that it inflated the numbers. An examination of the leaderboards in the individual stats seem to bear this out.

 

And performance enhancers have only compounded the problem, IMO.

 

 

 

.

 

The stat geeks have determined that all things being equal over the history of baseball that Lynn has the equivalent of 400 HRs.

 

And to back up your vote for the Hawk, his eqiuvalent number is 641.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BTW, Fred Lynn finished 4th in the MVP voting in 1979 with these numbers:

 

.333, 39 hr, 122 rbi....he finished behind this:

 

Don Baylor - .296, 36 hr, 139 rbi, AND 22 SB

Ken Singleton - .295, 35 hr, 111 rbi

George Brett - .329, 23 hr, 107 rbi

 

 

Very interesting that he finished 4th.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using the site you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Policies.