May 14, 200719 yr I post every article the same way, I wasn't trying to manipulate anything to my advantage. And they can blame it on all of the technicalities all they want to, I will always feel there is an ulterior motive behind this. And look at the last line I had posted anyways. Every employer I've worked for forbids accessing websites like the one's mentioned for the very same reason. You said that it was technical difficulties and then left it as though you didn't know what those difficulties were, like it was some ambiguous answer, when the reason was clearly stated in the article.
May 14, 200719 yr I post every article the same way, I wasn't trying to manipulate anything to my advantage. And they can blame it on all of the technicalities all they want to, I will always feel there is an ulterior motive behind this.Because you don't like the military or because you don't like the administration?
May 14, 200719 yr Author Meaning? Every article I post I put in the first few lines. Following the link provide I put my comments on the article which everyone can read for themselves. You were coming down on me as if I deleted part of a sentence or something to benefit my argument.
May 14, 200719 yr Author Because you don't like the military or because you don't like the administration? Administration. I wish the Military had more access to these sites than they do before this even occurred.
May 14, 200719 yr Every article I post I put in the first few lines. Following the link provide I put my comments on the article which everyone can read for themselves. You were coming down on me as if I deleted part of a sentence or something to benefit my argument.No, but as HHSDad just explained, the reason was clearly stated in the article. You ended with a which means?
May 14, 200719 yr Administration. I wish the Military had more access to these sites than they do before this even occurred.Do you work with computers at all? Or understand the resources sites such as these consume? I am going to assume by your answers that it's no.
May 14, 200719 yr Author No, but as HHSDad just explained, the reason was clearly stated in the article. You ended with a which means? Which means like I said earlier, I don't think that the technical difficulties (bandwidth resources and network availability) are the only motive for this action.
May 14, 200719 yr Author Do you work with computers at all? Or understand the resources sites such as these consume? I am going to assume by your answers that it's no. I quite familiar with computers but thanks for assuming. I am fully aware that these sites can cause problems but I just don't feel this is the only reasoning behind these actions.
May 14, 200719 yr Which means like I said earlier, I don't think that the technical difficulties (bandwidth resources and network availability) are the only motive for this action.I think you want it to be another motive, simply because you dislike the Bush administration. Nothing personal, it just seems that way to me.
May 14, 200719 yr Which ones? Maybe the ones who think that Iraq had something to do with 9/11. While 85% said the U.S. mission is mainly “to retaliate for Saddam’s role in the 9-11 attacks,” 77% said they also believe the main or a major reason for the war was “to stop Saddam from protecting al Qaeda in Iraq.”
May 14, 200719 yr Maybe the ones who think that Iraq had something to do with 9/11.Yeah, their all just sheep.
May 14, 200719 yr No, they're a legally captivated audience for anything their superiors are told to say to them. Don't try and paint me as being against men and women in uniform. I have more than a few friends that are active duty.
May 14, 200719 yr No, they're a legally captivated audience for anything their superiors are told to say to them. Don't try and paint me as being against men and women in uniform. I have more than a few friends that are active duty. So do I.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.