Wow, you must be pretty well off financially to turn down that chance, your brother too.

He only averaged more points (actually, less than A SINGULAR POINT) because he shot more. Garcia averaged more points per shot.

 

And like I said, he played on a bad team with no one of any account ahead of him. Garcia played behind Stojakovic and Artest. So I wouldn't exactly crow about minutes and starts. My little brother had an even chance to start for the Celtics this season.:thumb:

 

But you left out that Rondo also shot better from the field, rebounded better, had more steals and assists as well. And it is not like Rondo average 30-35 minutes per game, he only played 23 minutes per game. Solid year by Rondo, heck, he even shot right under 65 percent from the free throw line. Us Wildcat fans would have been in heaven if he would have done that while playing for UK!

Wow, you must be pretty well off financially to turn down that chance, your brother too.

We like the auction business.

 

To be honest, between appraisals and auctions, I promise you my lifetime earnings will exceed most NBA ballers.

But you left out that Rondo also shot better from the field, rebounded better, had more steals and assists as well. And it is not like Rondo average 30-35 minutes per game, he only played 23 minutes per game. Solid year by Rondo, heck, he even shot right under 65 percent from the free throw line. Us Wildcat fans would have been in heaven if he would have done that while playing for UK!

Rondo only shot better from the field because he's such a pathetic threat from deep that he knew better than to take too many shots. The fact remains that Cisco was a more efficient shooter.

 

He shot 150 more times than Garcia and averaged .8 points per game more than him.

Rondo only shot better from the field because he's such a pathetic threat from deep that he knew better than to take too many shots. The fact remains that Cisco was a more efficient shooter.

 

He shot 150 more times than Garcia and averaged .8 points per game more than him.

 

Its like saying Dennis Rodman is only a great rebounder because he couldnt score.

I dont think anyone is saying that Rondo had a great rookie year or that he really tore the NBA up. He had a decent rookie year and finished strong building some confidence for next year. What are you trying to get across or accomplish by bashing Rondo?

You have 10 of the 35 posts in this thread 02. Do you really not care?

I think the fact that he finished in the top 10 (if we are getting technical-12) rookies is a reason for congrats. He went 23rd I believe in the draft which means he improved upon that standing and all the haters that said he would never amount to anything. It's not saying that he will be great, but exceeding expectations is often a call for some congratulations.