UKMustangFan Posted January 3, 2007 Share Posted January 3, 2007 Xavier isn't any good. K-State should have their way with them in this one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HammerTime Posted January 3, 2007 Share Posted January 3, 2007 X is going to start coming together soon and be the team a lot of people thought they would be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UKMustangFan Posted January 3, 2007 Share Posted January 3, 2007 X is going to start coming together soon and be the team a lot of people thought they would be. They have Lavender and Duncan. What else do they have? The team that most thought they would be is an NIT team.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sharp Posted January 3, 2007 Share Posted January 3, 2007 I never cared much for Huggins, but IMO he is the best that UC will ever have. To be honest I kind of miss him at UC. It is hard to find a reason not to like them now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
h.s.sportsrbest Posted January 3, 2007 Share Posted January 3, 2007 The team that most thought they would be is an NIT team.... That is absolutely, postively, dead wrong. Here are a couple of note-worthy folks that thought they were, at worst, a Top 35 Team in America before the season. Before beating Villanova and Illinois. Have they had their share of horrible games, sure. However, to say they are "no good" is not correct. CollegeHoops.net: #35: Xavier Musketeers The deepest team in the Atlantic 10 is a favorite for the conference title. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- AP Preseason: Xavier Musketeers #29 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coaches Poll Preaseason: Xavier Musketeers #31 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HammerTime Posted January 3, 2007 Share Posted January 3, 2007 That is absolutely, postively, dead wrong. Here are a couple of note-worthy folks that thought they were, at worst, a Top 35 Team in America before the season. Before beating Villanova and Illinois. Have they had their share of horrible games, sure. However, to say they are "no good" is not correct. :ylsuper: :ylsuper: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UKMustangFan Posted January 3, 2007 Share Posted January 3, 2007 That is absolutely, postively, dead wrong. Here are a couple of note-worthy folks that thought they were, at worst, a Top 35 Team in America before the season. Before beating Villanova and Illinois. Have they had their share of horrible games, sure. However, to say they are "no good" is not correct. CollegeHoops.net: #35: Xavier Musketeers The deepest team in the Atlantic 10 is a favorite for the conference title. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- AP Preseason: Xavier Musketeers #29 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coaches Poll Preaseason: Xavier Musketeers #31 NIT bound...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
h.s.sportsrbest Posted January 3, 2007 Share Posted January 3, 2007 NIT bound...... ...and if they make the dance you sport an "X" avatar for the month of April? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UKMustangFan Posted January 3, 2007 Share Posted January 3, 2007 ...and if they make the dance you sport an "X" avatar for the month of April? Sure....Although being conference champ in the A-10 is about as honorable as winning the Big Sky. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
h.s.sportsrbest Posted January 3, 2007 Share Posted January 3, 2007 Sure....Although being conference champ in the A-10 is about as honorable as winning the Big Sky. Great...you'll look smashing. FYI, the A-10 is currently ranked as the 14th best conference, the Big Sky the 25th. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UKMustangFan Posted January 3, 2007 Share Posted January 3, 2007 Great...you'll look smashing. FYI, the A-10 is currently ranked as the 14th best conference, the Big Sky the 25th. Anywhere outside the best 10 and I pretty much stop ranking.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
h.s.sportsrbest Posted January 3, 2007 Share Posted January 3, 2007 Anywhere outside the best 10 and I pretty much stop ranking.... OK, I'll let Calipari and Memphis know that their Conference isn't worth the UKMF ranking. I'm sure they'll turn down their 3 or 4 seed because of that. :thumb: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UKMustangFan Posted January 3, 2007 Share Posted January 3, 2007 OK, I'll let Calipari and Memphis know that their Conference isn't worth the UKMF ranking. I'm sure they'll turn down their 3 or 4 seed because of that. :thumb: They're a legit top 20 team, their conference isn't. Unfortunately for the A-10, they don't have such a team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wireman Posted January 3, 2007 Share Posted January 3, 2007 Strip clubs - here he comes! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
h.s.sportsrbest Posted January 3, 2007 Share Posted January 3, 2007 They're a legit top 20 team, their conference isn't. Unfortunately for the A-10, they don't have such a team. I didn't say they did. I simply inferred that dismissing every non-Top 10 Conference as equal could lead you into difficult debates to win. That was my only point. I would think Butler in the Horizon would agree as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts