Seneca has lost to a terrible Valley team and now beats a very good Western team. Very surprised by this score. Makes you wonder if Western had players missing. Never know in these covid times.

Looks like just great win for Seneca!

2 hours ago, Tigerpride94 said:

Seneca has lost to a terrible Valley team and now beats a very good Western team. Very surprised by this score. Makes you wonder if Western had players missing. Never know in these covid times.

Valley game was mid-December, though. Looks like Seneca has been playing much better of late. This win helps confirm that. 

2 hours ago, gchs_uk9 said:

Valley game was mid-December, though. Looks like Seneca has been playing much better of late. This win helps confirm that. 

They got Male next so will really see how much they improved.

Did they get a player eligible that hadn’t played all year?

53 minutes ago, Tigerpride94 said:

They got Male next so will really see how much they improved.

I’d say the gap is pretty wide between Western and Male. A poor performance by Seneca against H doesn’t necessarily negate their improvement on the season. 

22 minutes ago, gchs_uk9 said:

I’d say the gap is pretty wide between Western and Male. A poor performance by Seneca against H doesn’t necessarily negate their improvement on the season. 

I've seen Seneca twice against St. X. They are a scrappy team with a great player in Delshawn Sims. They are 9-14 with some games they play better than others. They are like Dr. Jekyl and Mr. Hyde type team.

Seneca is a talented squad - much better than that record.

Western is extraordinarily talented - but they are still very young.   Young teams are prone to up-and-down play.....