Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

BluegrassPreps.com

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Sanctuary city mayors fire back at Trump administration's threat to cut fed funding

Featured Replies

The Justice Department's threat Monday to pull funding from local and state governments that refuse to comply with federal immigration enforcement laws drew a defiant response from big-city mayors.

 

Attorney General Jeff Sessions took the podium at the White House press briefing to fire the broadside at cities that refuse to notify Immigration and Customs Enforcement when they have illegal immigrants in custody. Judging from the response from mayors of the nation's biggest cities, the Trump administration has a fight on its hands.

 

Sanctuary city mayors fire back at Trump administration's threat to cut fed funding | Fox News

The Justice Department's threat Monday to pull funding from local and state governments that refuse to comply with federal immigration enforcement laws drew a defiant response from big-city mayors.

 

Attorney General Jeff Sessions took the podium at the White House press briefing to fire the broadside at cities that refuse to notify Immigration and Customs Enforcement when they have illegal immigrants in custody. Judging from the response from mayors of the nation's biggest cities, the Trump administration has a fight on its hands.

 

Sanctuary city mayors fire back at Trump administration's threat to cut fed funding | Fox News

 

Shouldn't they be arresting those city and state leaders for breaking the law?

  • Author

I feel our Bridge hanging in the balance...

 

And I can't believe the Sanctuary City Mayors didn't see this one coming.

 

I guess the larger question is what is the Federal Government's role when City or State Governments violate Federal law and they do it knowingly?

  • Author
Shouldn't they be arresting those city and state leaders for breaking the law?

 

In addition from being removed from office.

If the Federal government does not arrest people who breaks the laws they have on the books then they are no longer in control. So either change the laws or arrest anyone who defies the law.

In addition from being removed from office.

 

I assumed one leads to the other but yes.

  • Author
If the Federal government does not arrest people who breaks the laws they have on the books then they are no longer in control. So either change the laws or arrest anyone who defies the law.

 

I agree.

 

I wish the Feds/President would come out stronger on this issue and tell them our first approach is going to be withholding Federal money and then for anyone that continues to break the law they will be arrested and prosecuted.

I agree.

 

I wish the Feds/President would come out stronger on this issue and tell them our first approach is going to be withholding Federal money and then for anyone that continues to break the law they will be arrested and prosecuted.

 

So is the government going to start arresting people in Colorado for smoking marijuana too? Legal there, against federal law.

So is the government going to start arresting people in Colorado for smoking marijuana too? Legal there, against federal law.

 

They could, yes.

  • Author
So is the government going to start arresting people in Colorado for smoking marijuana too? Legal there, against federal law.

 

I hear what you are saying but this is a little apples and oranges. Immigration Law is handled by the Federal Government Period. Marijuana Law is handled both by the Federal Government and State Governments.

 

The option here would be for the Federal Government to allow each state to decide on Immigration Law for that individual State which is not going to happen.

I hear what you are saying but this is a little apples and oranges. Immigration Law is handled by the Federal Government Period. Marijuana Law is handled both by the Federal Government and State Governments.

 

The option here would be for the Federal Government to allow each state to decide on Immigration Law for that individual State which is not going to happen.

 

I'm a huge state's rights person, so I'd be much more comfortable with them allowing each state to make their own decisions/laws than I would be picking and choosing what Federal laws to enforce and which to ignore.

I'm a huge state's rights person, so I'd be much more comfortable with them allowing each state to make their own decisions/laws than I would be picking and choosing what Federal laws to enforce and which to ignore.

 

I lean with you on this, but I am with @theguru on Immigration, it can not be a state's control issue.

Edited by plantmanky

  • Author
I'm a huge state's rights person, so I'd be much more comfortable with them allowing each state to make their own decisions/laws than I would be picking and choosing what Federal laws to enforce and which to ignore.

 

I agree and generally believe if the Feds pushed Immigration down to the State level you would have the very safe states that have ID/Citizenship Laws where no (or very few outside of Public Safety) Government services are provided for non-legal people. In other words, in the safe states the burden is on the individual to prove they are "legal" for lack of a better description. And you would have all the crazy, dangerous, sanctuary states where everyone is welcome and the rules really don't apply.

 

In other words, we would all figure out what works and what doesn't work in very short order.

I agree and generally believe if the Feds pushed Immigration down to the State level you would have the very safe states that have ID/Citizenship Laws where no (or very few outside of Public Safety) Government services are provided for non-legal people. In other words, in the safe states the burden is on the individual to prove they are "legal" for lack of a better description. And you would have all the crazy, dangerous, sanctuary states where everyone is welcome and the rules really don't apply.

 

In other words, we would all figure out what works and what doesn't work in very short order.

 

Who decides who qualifies for Federal Benefits? Who decides who gets to vote in Federal Elections?

  • Author
Who decides who qualifies for Federal Benefits?

 

You are off on tangent. I am saying we all get Police Protection and Emergency Medical Treatment and if anyone wants/expects anything more they have to follow all the rules.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.