What will be the next scandal? It appears this one might be dying to the graveyard that the women who accused Trump of sexually assaulting them went.

 

Priebus says US intel officials call campaign-Russia story 'garbage,' tries to end controversy | Fox News

 

From the article:

 

White House Chief of Staff Reince Priebus said Sunday that top U.S. intelligence officials have told him that Donald Trump’s presidential campaign did not collude with Russia -- attempting to end widespread new reports about potentially compromising, illegal talks with the former Cold War enemy.

 

 

“I can assure you, the top levels of the intelligence community have assured me that [the allegation] is not only grossly overstated, but also wrong,” Priebus told “Fox News Sunday.” “They have made it very clear that the story is complete garbage.”

What will be the next scandal? It appears this one might be dying to the graveyard that the women who accused Trump of sexually assaulting them went.

 

Priebus says US intel officials call campaign-Russia story 'garbage,' tries to end controversy | Fox News

 

From the article:

 

White House Chief of Staff Reince Priebus said Sunday that top U.S. intelligence officials have told him that Donald Trump’s presidential campaign did not collude with Russia -- attempting to end widespread new reports about potentially compromising, illegal talks with the former Cold War enemy.

 

 

“I can assure you, the top levels of the intelligence community have assured me that [the allegation] is not only grossly overstated, but also wrong,” Priebus told “Fox News Sunday.” “They have made it very clear that the story is complete garbage.”

 

A few things:

 

1. He could be 100% right.

2. No reason to fully believe him (or any administration talking head)

3. The irony of not sourcing it after complaining about not sourcing it

4. OJ wasn't convicted so no guilty conviction doesn't mean innocent, right?

A few things:

 

1. He could be 100% right.

2. No reason to fully believe him (or any administration talking head)

3. The irony of not sourcing it after complaining about not sourcing it

4. OJ wasn't convicted so no guilty conviction doesn't mean innocent, right?

 

I would think he is innocent until proven guilty. I will say, I have never seen women who accused someone publicly of sexual assault just disappear like these have have you? Especially with a person of as high of a profile as the President of the United States. I think common sense would tell us that if that had happened also that we have seen more out of it. This seems to be more of the same.

 

I think the best thing we all could do is let see what he does. We all know he is a loud mouthed braggart, but lets judge him on what he does. Now for that to happen the obstructionists have to stop. Or will they. Will Former President Obama quit leading a charge with his activists from behind the scenes?

I would think he is innocent until proven guilty. I will say, I have never seen women who accused someone publicly of sexual assault just disappear like these have have you? Especially with a person of as high of a profile as the President of the United States. I think common sense would tell us that if that had happened also that we have seen more out of it. This seems to be more of the same.

 

I think the best thing we all could do is let see what he does. We all know he is a loud mouthed braggart, but lets judge him on what he does. Now for that to happen the obstructionists have to stop. Or will they. Will Former President Obama quit leading a charge with his activists from behind the scenes?

 

So NOW we wait until real proof comes out? President Bush and President Obama are chuckling(and every other high-profile official).

So NOW we wait until real proof comes out? President Bush and President Obama are chuckling(and every other high-profile official).

 

What should we do then Clyde? Impeach Trump and put the candidate of your choice in?

What should we do then Clyde? Impeach Trump and put the candidate of your choice in?

 

We should do what we are doing. Look into it. Vet it. See if there are an illegalities.

 

Who's against that?

We should do what we are doing. Look into it. Vet it. See if there are an illegalities.

 

Who's against that?

 

It seems according to this report thats been done and seems to be over, would you not agree. Your links you provide to the stories you post about have they been vetted? Am I supposed to believe what you post vs what I or any other poster posts, more and consider just because you post it that its correct?

It seems according to this report thats been done and seems to be over, would you not agree. Your links you provide to the stories you post about have they been vetted? Am I supposed to believe what you post vs what I or any other poster posts, more and consider just because you post it that its correct?

 

Senate Intel committee has told the administration to preserve all records regarding Russia.

 

Doesn't sound like they are saying there's nothing.

Senate Intel committee has told the administration to preserve all records regarding Russia.

 

Doesn't sound like they are saying there's nothing.

 

Of course not. You going to issue a decree thats this is false?

I saw an interview with him this morning and the ONLY thing he wanted to talk about was that the administration was victim to fake news. He defines fake news, as news without a named source. Which he then dropped some info, citing unnamed government officials. He also, when pressed, asked for the names of the people making statements that were being discussed.

 

All in all, it was a really bizzare segment. And my feeling is that top to bottom, this administration will continue this line of answers. And I think it's because of a few things, the biggest being no one knows what the hell is going on. So, they'll all just keep bringing the crazy and attacking the media, individuals & companies, in an attempt to hang on until the ship actually can start sailing. They really don't have any answers.

I'm absolutely sure we're not going to find out in a couple years that there was hush money paid by an extremely rich POTUS to shut up those women he may or may not have grabbed in their crotch. I'm sure that has nothing to do with their silence.

I'm absolutely sure we're not going to find out in a couple years that there was hush money paid by an extremely rich POTUS to shut up those women he may or may not have grabbed in their crotch. I'm sure that has nothing to do with their silence.

 

Tmz reporter now... Really.... Look at his wifes and look at his acusersers. Not his level, he can buy a wife, why buy the hags. If it smells its liberal crap. Jim it smells.

Of course not. You going to issue a decree thats this is false?

 

What decree have I made previously ?

It's all false. Nothing but a rouse to detract from corrupt Hillary and Barry's corrupt admin.

This "Russian hack" stuff is just nonsense. It is just one of the left's ways of trying to make Trump look de-legitimate. Notice there are NEVER any SPECIFICS given. Notice that nobody ever says that actual votes were compromised. Notice when there is a story that says that some of Trump's team was working with the Russians, there is a disclaimer that there is no real evidence of such. Again, are we only talking about Podesta's emails or is there anything else? I have asked this question MANY times and NOBODY can point to anything besides that.

 

Priebus is totally correct to just call it what it is..."garbage"...