I made a sarcastic remark about the video because that is what was said to me. And everyone is entitled to an opinion, but I go off the physical evidence which is not opinionated nor does it lie.

 

First off, you were not being sarcastic. Also, you do not have access to the actual reconstruction or evidence, and that I know is a fact. You obviously have an axe to grind, why else would you go out to the scene several times?

So you know when someone is being sarcastic or not? Apparently not. And no I don't have access to the evidence the police collected. Do you? And I used to travel that section of road a lot. No axe to grind, just don't like seeing people wronged and no one held accountable. You "obviously" are LEO or close to one to defend the way you do. And one more thing: show me the physical evidence and eyewitness accounts that proves me wrong.

Didn't she run over his foot which led to him jumping on the car to keep from being ran over? Wasn't their evidence on his boots that she drove over his foot? If she was steering to the left when she hit him, the only place he had to go was on the hood.

 

As far as the settlement goes, the insurance carrier for the county will determine the risk and cost of going to trial and will in almost every case they will make an offer to settle instead of going to court.

 

I heard part of the settlement was above what the insurance company would pay and it has to be covered by the county.

So you know when someone is being sarcastic or not? Apparently not. And no I don't have access to the evidence the police collected. Do you? And I used to travel that section of road a lot. No axe to grind, just don't like seeing people wronged and no one held accountable. You "obviously" are LEO or close to one to defend the way you do. And one more thing: show me the physical evidence and eyewitness accounts that proves me wrong.

 

If he was in the wrong, he'd have been indicted. She set the events in motion. Period. And let's just assume I have direct evidence or witness statements or a conversation I had with the deputy, I sure as hell wouldn't share it with you or on a public forum. So, instead I'll just tell you that you are wrong and I'm completely satisfied knowing that you do not know what you are talking about and simply giving your uneducated OPINION. :thumb:

Unless you were standing there and saw it happen, and have it all on video to back that up, you can say I and a thousand others are wrong all you want. As far as him being indicted, guilty people get away with things every day.... And I don't assume anything when it comes to an accident or homicide or anything for that matter. And you can keep calling it uneducated all you want, doesn't change the facts or what I know better than most ever will about cars, how they react in accidents, how they bend, what causes them to do what they do after an impact, my ability to judge distance, knowing how fast a person can react versus a car, and how to look at the physics of things versus what someone said. I didn't just look at the video and come to my conclusion, not at all. Neither one of us will ever know exactly what happened that night. But answer this if your know so much; how often does a police officer getn front of a moving car on purpose and fire his weapon to stop a person trying to flee a traffic stop, which the suspect has not even committed a crime? I know they don't teach that in training.

Unless you were standing there and saw it happen, and have it all on video to back that up, you can say I and a thousand others are wrong all you want. As far as him being indicted, guilty people get away with things every day.... And I don't assume anything when it comes to an accident or homicide or anything for that matter. And you can keep calling it uneducated all you want, doesn't change the facts or what I know better than most ever will about cars, how they react in accidents, how they bend, what causes them to do what they do after an impact, my ability to judge distance, knowing how fast a person can react versus a car, and how to look at the physics of things versus what someone said. I didn't just look at the video and come to my conclusion, not at all. Neither one of us will ever know exactly what happened that night. But answer this if your know so much; how often does a police officer getn front of a moving car on purpose and fire his weapon to stop a person trying to flee a traffic stop, which the suspect has not even committed a crime? I know they don't teach that in training.

 

Ok :thumb:

Ohio Police High Speed Pursuit Cop On Hood Killing Suspect (Dashcam Videos) - YouTube

So your video just reinforces what I say. The officer got out of his car and got on the hood of the suspects car for no reason. Any good driver trained for this situation could have stopped that car without jumping on the hood and shooting multiple times at the driver. I will agree that the driver was a danger to others ( because you saw the high speeds and passing of other motorist)had to be stopped. This is totally a different situation as to what happened with the Ramsey girl. This driver committed multiple crimes before the shooting, yet the shooting Is still not justified. Ramsey committed no crime that the officer knew of.

I suppose you think Ray Tensing is innocent also?

So your video just reinforces what I say. The officer got out of his car and got on the hood of the suspects car for no reason. Any good driver trained for this situation could have stopped that car without jumping on the hood and shooting multiple times at the driver. I will agree that the driver was a danger to others ( because you saw the high speeds and passing of other motorist)had to be stopped. This is totally a different situation as to what happened with the Ramsey girl. This driver committed multiple crimes before the shooting, yet the shooting Is still not justified. Ramsey committed no crime that the officer knew of.

 

It's not justified in YOUR OPINION. The legal system said otherwise, but what the hell do they know?

I suppose you think Ray Tensing is innocent also?

 

You do realize that no two police shootings are alike right? And for the record, I think Tensing made a lot of errors, but nice try. Keep reaching, it looks good on you :thumb:

Yes I do realize no two instances are the same. Yet you posted a video that is totally different circumstances than the Ramsey case. Not reaching for anything. Your the one defending the police here. I will give a lot of the blame to police who are not trained properly for these situations. Trust me, if I can catch up with you in a car, I can stop you and make sure you don't continue on without shooting you.

Oh yeh, the legal system is not always correct either...

Yes I do realize no two instances are the same. Yet you posted a video that is totally different circumstances than the Ramsey case. Not reaching for anything. Your the one defending the police here. I will give a lot of the blame to police who are not trained properly for these situations. Trust me, if I can catch up with you in a car, I can stop you and make sure you don't continue on without shooting you.

 

First off, Boone County is as top notch and well trained of a department as you will find ANYWHERE. And your last sentence shows what a complete and utter fool you are. Guess, what slick, you try and physically intervene at a speed greater than 35 MPH, that's considered deadly force...you know, the same as firing a weapon. Leave law enforcement to trained officers.

Oh yeh, the legal system is not always correct either...

 

God, if everyone was a smart as you.... Seriously, I gotta know. What's your qualifications? Highest level of education? College? If so, in what field of study? If you graduated, please let me know what institution so I know where NOT to send my kids.