November 22, 20169 yr Killed at such a young age and still so many different theories to as who and why. I still wonder how JFK jr would have ever ran for President.
November 25, 20169 yr Author Many" theories" but just one truth. Oswald acted alone. Well how was 5-7 shots fired. Oswald fired 3, what about the others.
November 25, 20169 yr Many" theories" but just one truth. Oswald acted alone. There is no doubt in my mind that President Kennedy was also shot from the right/front as well.
November 25, 20169 yr There is no doubt in my mind that President Kennedy was also shot from the right/front as well. Not a shred of evidence.
November 25, 20169 yr Three shots, one shooter. The second and third shots hit the President. The third shot killed him. Case closed , except for conspiracy theorists who want to keep it open for discussion and probably will so for another century.
November 25, 20169 yr Well how was 5-7 shots fired. Oswald fired 3, what about the others. There were no "others". Only 3 shot were fired, which Oswald had 8.5 seconds to get off, with the first shot not counting in the time laspe. To remove all doubts that Oswald acted alone and no conspiracy read Vincent Bugliosi's 1600 page book, that took over 20 years to research and complete, titled "Reclaiming History: The Assassination of President John F Kennedy". Another well researched book that is also shorter and easier to read than Bugliosi's tome is Gerald Posner's "Case Closed: Lee Harvey Oswald and the Assassination of JFK".
November 25, 20169 yr There were no "others". Only 3 shot were fired, which Oswald had 8.5 seconds to get off, with the first shot not counting in the time laspe. To remove all doubts that Oswald acted alone and no conspiracy read Vincent Bugliosi's 1600 page book, that took over 20 years to research and complete, titled "Reclaiming History: The Assassination of President John F Kennedy". Another well researched book that is also shorter and easier to read than Bugliosi's tome is Gerald Posner's "Case Closed: Lee Harvey Oswald and the Assassination of JFK". But the "Garrison's" of the world will never the facts rest in peace.
November 25, 20169 yr Author Three shots, one shooter. The second and third shots hit the President. The third shot killed him. Case closed , except for conspiracy theorists who want to keep it open for discussion and probably will so for another century. There were no "others". Only 3 shot were fired, which Oswald had 8.5 seconds to get off, with the first shot not counting in the time laspe. To remove all doubts that Oswald acted alone and no conspiracy read Vincent Bugliosi's 1600 page book, that took over 20 years to research and complete, titled "Reclaiming History: The Assassination of President John F Kennedy". Another well researched book that is also shorter and easier to read than Bugliosi's tome is Gerald Posner's "Case Closed: Lee Harvey Oswald and the Assassination of JFK". They disagree and even say more than 3 shots fired. You all can think whatever but JFK was shot from the front and more than one shooter was there. United States House Select Committee on Assassinations - Wikipedia
November 25, 20169 yr Author The Committee further concluded that it was probable that: four shots were fired the fourth shot came from a second assassin located on the grassy knoll, but missed. The HSCA concluded the existence and location of this alleged fourth shot based on the later discredited Dallas Police Department Dictabelt recording analysis.[20]
November 25, 20169 yr The Committee further concluded that it was probable that: four shots were fired the fourth shot came from a second assassin located on the grassy knoll, but missed. The HSCA concluded the existence and location of this alleged fourth shot based on the later discredited Dallas Police Department Dictabelt recording analysis.[20] The testimony that you mention was based on faulty technology that was presented to the committee and has long since been ruled invalid and inaccurate. Dale Myers' recreated computer animation of the assassination that day proves this. The motorcycle cop and dictabelt were not in an area that could have recorded the shots that day. Even the cop on the motorcycle admits this, and film of the motorcade prove it. Research Dale Myers work. Also, Google the website of JFK researcher John McAdams. He has a huge amount of research on the subject. And read Bugliosi and Posner's books.
November 25, 20169 yr But the "Garrison's" of the world will never the facts rest in peace. Conspiracy advocates keep the subject hot because it makes many of them money in magazines, books and documentaries. I've always said that the majority of the biggest name advocates don't even believe themselves what they write. Mark Lane made a good living starting in the mid 1960s with conspiracy books and lectures. He had a con game going and knew it. As for Garrison, there's no doubt in my mind that the man had a mental illness. He was delusional. Johnny Carson made him look like a fool during one of his appearances on the show. In the long run his prosecution of Clay Shaw failed and he was humiliated, yet Oliver Stone decided years later to base his error filled movie on this sad man's work. Vincent Bugliosi said Oliver Stone got only two things right in his movie: (1)the date that the assassination occurred and (2)the fact that JFK died. Therefore, I suppose we can add another name to the conspiracy con list: Oliver Stone. The sad thing, though, is that a generation of kids took that movie as gospel, as historic fact, when it was anything but that.
November 25, 20169 yr Author And I'm sure the brain could have proved if the shot came from the front or back. So what did the brain of JFK show?
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.