And this is tame compared to most October surprises. Makes one wonder what's next.

 

I agree. From both sides.

This is a he said/She said deal. If Trump is smart he sues the Times.

This is a he said/She said deal. If Trump is smart he sues the Times.

 

What would he sue the NYT for? A person made an allegation. They reported it. That's not slander/libel (whichever one deals with print).

Anything is possible.

 

Your previous post said only "Dems" will believe this. Seemed to indicate you thought it wasn't possible. I would be stunned to find even the most hard-core Trump apologist that believed it's not possible. Anything is possible with Trump.

What would he sue the NYT for? A person made an allegation. They reported it. That's not slander/libel (whichever one deals with print).

 

You just cant print anything you want based on what someone says unless it can be proven correct? I mean what if a newspaper decides to print something on you I say, which is totally false and stands to hurt your career and reputation? Who is libel?

My question is this. Why are they suddenly coming out of the woodwork? And who is paying them? Its them pesky Russians again. Nobody except Dems gonna buy this crap.

 

It is a crazy mystery!

 

Trump brags about sexually assaulting women 11 years ago. Falsely. Gotta keep in mind, for some unknown reason, Trump thought it would be good to brag about committing sexual assaults that he wasn't doing. And in a huge mystery, women come forward and say he assaulted them in a very similar way to his false confession lol.

 

I mean, we all know you guys are going to say these women are liars. Poor Trump was just locker room talking and making up lies where he assaulted women and he ends up dovetailing his locker room talk with future lies.

 

Or maybe he is a serial sexual predator, and he was telling the truth on that bus.

Your previous post said only "Dems" will believe this. Seemed to indicate you thought it wasn't possible. I would be stunned to find even the most hard-core Trump apologist that believed it's not possible. Anything is possible with Trump.

 

Again I question the timing. Why come forth now? You are very absent from the Wikileaks threads Clyde. I would have bet $100 dollars you would be the author of this thread when I saw it on TV tonight. Very predictable. Russians. Nothing to see here.

If you are still on the Trump train at this point I don't know what to say.

You just cant print anything you want based on what someone says unless it can be proven correct? I mean what if a newspaper decides to print something on you I say, which is totally false and stands to hurt your career and reputation? Who is libel?

 

Cough...cough...

Breitbart, Daily Caller...

Again I question the timing. Why come forth now? You are very absent from the Wikileaks threads Clyde. I would have bet $100 dollars you would be the author of this thread when I saw it on TV tonight. Very predictable. Russians. Nothing to see here.

 

You answered your own question. Timing is everything.

Again I question the timing. Why come forth now? You are very absent from the Wikileaks threads Clyde. I would have bet $100 dollars you would be the author of this thread when I saw it on TV tonight. Very predictable. Russians. Nothing to see here.

 

JJ,

Maybe the Times had this and was waiting for clarification or some proof, and magically Don gave it in his taped 2005 interview.

You just cant print anything you want based on what someone says unless it can be proven correct? I mean what if a newspaper decides to print something on you I say, which is totally false and stands to hurt your career and reputation? Who is libel?

 

First, Trump has to prove the statement is false. Not sure how he will do that.

 

Next is that Trump is considered to be a public person. This means that Trump would have to prove the NYT knew this report was false.

 

Seems like a tall hurdle to win a libel suit.

Look I have said it before, I dont really like Trump. Only think he has going for him with me is he is better than Hillary. If she wins then I will complain till she is gone. After this election I will never ever consider voting for a Democrat again. Ever.

JJ,

Maybe the Times had this and was waiting for clarification or some proof, and magically Don gave it in his taped 2005 interview.

 

Russians Hellcats. You have not been listening. Pesky Russians.

Again I question the timing. Why come forth now? You are very absent from the Wikileaks threads Clyde. I would have bet $100 dollars you would be the author of this thread when I saw it on TV tonight. Very predictable. Russians. Nothing to see here.

 

I've been absent from a lot of threads. Been in Asheville for 3 days. Just got back a few hours ago. Part of the time in Asheville I was without connection to the interwebs.

 

Stories came out at about 9:30 or so. I'm topical. I posted it. Hard to deny it's going to be a story. If it offends your senses, hit the ignore key.