October 10, 201312 yr Ummm, it's on FX. How in the world can one classify it as soft porn? to be fair wasn't Nip/Tuck on FX? :lol2: Let's not forget about the season premier of SOA last season as well when Jemma introduces us to Nero..... Wasn't Jax "busy" as well...
October 10, 201312 yr Ummm, it's on FX. How in the world can one classify it as soft porn? to be fair wasn't Nip/Tuck on FX? :lol2: delete
October 10, 201312 yr Let's not forget about the season premier of SOA last season as well when Jemma introduces us to Nero..... Wasn't Jax "busy" as well... Yeah....I guess I have a different definition of soft porn than most....:idunno: :lol2:
October 10, 201312 yr Since there was no nudity shown, I wouldn't consider it pornography, but I can understand how some don't appreciate over sexual elements. Consider the scene where the young witch is in the hospital room. The first part of that was the first time I had ever seen that on FX.
October 10, 201312 yr Ok, we need to come up with a new term. Since Soft Porn is basically whats on Cinemax after midnight, what is on FX since no nudity is shown should be called something else....like dry porn....sorta like dry hump. It's deffinatley up for a better name lol
October 17, 201312 yr Putting the boyfriend back together was a little weird, but other than that, another solid episode.
October 17, 201312 yr Definitely interesting. I wasn't expecting much from this episode, based on last week's previews, but I was pleasantly surprised. Looking forward to next week.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.