June 5, 201313 yr No one has yet made a convincing argument of how this is any more onerous then being fingerprinted at arrest.
June 5, 201313 yr No one has yet made a convincing argument of how this is any more onerous then being fingerprinted at arrest. One is a form of identification, the other is a blantant violation of a person's civil liberties. It continues to amazes me how many are so up in arms that the government dare attempt to infringe on their right to bear arms, but don't seem to care when the most basic of our civil liberties are violated.
June 5, 201313 yr No one has yet made a convincing argument of how this is any more onerous then being fingerprinted at arrest. They say it is okay to insert something into an orifice, putting my finger in ink is a little different. Are they permitted to take a swab from anywhere or did they define only certain places?
June 5, 201313 yr One is a form of identification, the other is a blantant violation of a person's civil liberties. It continues to amazes me how many are so up in arms that the government dare attempt to infringe on their right to bear arms, but don't seem to care when the most basic of our civil liberties are violated. Honestly, I don't see how it is any more than another form of identification.
June 5, 201313 yr Honestly, I don't see how it is any more than another form of identification. Me either, for those that can't stand the thought of a q-tip in their cheek how about a couple of strands of hair? Would that be invasive too? How about a small piece of finger nail or what if they just asked you to spit in a cup? There are many ways to get DNA without going into one of your orifices.
June 5, 201313 yr One is a form of identification, the other is a blantant violation of a person's civil liberties. It continues to amazes me how many are so up in arms that the government dare attempt to infringe on their right to bear arms, but don't seem to care when the most basic of our civil liberties are violated. You're going to have to explain that one because I'm still not seeing it.
June 5, 201313 yr Someone check...I think hell has frozen over. I agree with All Tell and Jumper Dad.
June 5, 201313 yr There's a huge difference there. You have chosen to work there. That would be the same with me giving the ok to nationwide drug testing because my employer requires it. You can choose NOT to commit a crime.
June 6, 201313 yr Someone check...I think hell has frozen over. I agree with All Tell and Jumper Dad. There is hope for you yet RM!!!
June 6, 201313 yr You can choose NOT to commit a crime. You haven't committed a crime yet. You've only arrested! BIG difference in this country.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.