Which players played mostly JV as juniors?

 

Mieners from x for sure.

Article on the Elam kid. BIG!

 

http://www.courier-journal.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2013303270143

 

Good Article, but only caught one mistake. Alabama Actually offered him first. Interesting considering the other schools choices are not quite Alabama caliber. UK offered him after Elam tweeted that the tide offered him. As a UK fan, feelin a bit frustrated by their recruiting prowess. Although this new staff seems to be combing through in state talent quite well. Hope the Cats can land him.

Fant deserves to be top 3.

Fant deserves to be top 3.

 

I think the credibility of these rankings are already shot.

I think the credibility of these rankings are already shot.

 

How would you rank them then?

How would you rank them then?

 

Well for starters, sure fire mr. Football candidate Charles walker would be in the list.

Seeing as this is that persons opinion based list on whatever criteria he used. How is his credibility shot? There's only 25 slots, so many kids are going to be left off. It's just another list that provokes discussion. I'm sure there will be 100 more lists to dissect and complain about coming soon. I see 25 deserving kids on that list.

Seeing as this is that persons opinion based list on whatever criteria he used. How is his credibility shot? There's only 25 slots, so many kids are going to be left off. It's just another list that provokes discussion. I'm sure there will be 100 more lists to dissect and complain about coming soon. I see 25 deserving kids on that list.

 

Exactly. His opinion is not a credible source.

Exactly. His opinion is not a credible source.

 

So, who would you remove from the list?

So, who would you remove from the list?

 

If I had to remove someone, Meiners from X. But the better question is, why wouldn't you include walker? He's been the tigers leading rusher the past 2seasons. He also is one of the front runners for mr. Football

 

If I had to remove someone, Meiners from X. But the better question is, why wouldn't you include walker? He's been the tigers leading rusher the past 2seasons. He also is one of the front runners for mr. Football

 

That I can agree with.

But a credible source is what you take it to be.

Although him being a good player on the best team doesn't necessarily mean he is 1 of the top 25 players in the state. Mr football or not. That's all political anyway

If I had to remove someone, Meiners from X. But the better question is, why wouldn't you include walker? He's been the tigers leading rusher the past 2seasons. He also is one of the front runners for mr. Football

 

The list is about recruits. Who would be the better, higher rated, recruit? Meiners or Walker? I don't know. I don't know either of them. I am not saying either way. But, based on what rivals, scout and others have to say about their vitals (ie size, position, etc.), I am guessing, Meiners will be a more sought after recruit. Not saying that he is a better high school football player at this time, or in the past, just that he will likely be rated higher from a college football scouting perspective. Right now, it is about potential. I am guessing that this is the case here. I hope they both end up with high d-1 offers. KY HS football just isn't highly regarded at this time. The more d-1 recruits that come out of KY the better for everyone else in the future. There are D-1 programs that don't even have scouts assigned to KY. That changes only when there are enough quality football athletes coming out of the state to require it. JMHO, based on experience.

But a credible source is what you take it to be.

 

Exactly, I don't take it to be credible. But to your other post: how do you put another player from the same squad who is unproven on the list and leave the proven player out? You can remove the names and the teams involved and that still doesn't make sense. If its based on speculation or potential, how is that player left off the list? Please inform how.