I think Kentucky allowing around 30 regular season games/season is much more like it. And I might add, when it comes to basketball, overall, Kentucky is much better than my native state to the north.

 

I may upset some people by saying this, but to the above, I say ditto and Ohio is and always will be a football state.

The 30 game limit was enacted to do away with having to interpret how many games you were charged for playing in multi-game tournaments. To simplify things, they came out with the blanket 30 game season ruling.

 

I do not want to see them cut back on that number of games. With having to schedule conference games, All "A" Regional, and hopefully "A" State games, and space for a holiday tournament, leaves very little wiggle room as it is. Take away 3 games and the cheese gets quite binding.

 

Easy fix - Do away with the first round of football playoff games and get them back to a more reasonable playoff system. They used to have their state championships on Thanksgiving weekend. Since expanding the football playoffs, the squeeze has been on basketball to cut back on games.

Only allow the top 2 teams in the district standings in the playoffs...both go straight to the regional, or

How about only allowing one team to advance from the district, or

Cut out Dist Championship game since the out come doesn't matter.

Speaking of games and everything, I know theirs contracts involved with teams, my question is, if 2 teams agree to play, can they go ahead and sign the contract that holds them to playing each other and stops them from backing out or do they have to wait until the entire season (sweet 16) and all is over?