November 2, 201213 yr The original posts said "bad" D3 team. I mean a bad D3 team. Still too strong. I've been watching Trinity for many years and have seen D3 games for the last 15 years or so. There would be a mismatch of great proportions. As you may know I am a Trinity fan, but I have to be honest and still say no way.
November 2, 201213 yr Author I mean a bad D3 team. Still too strong. I've been watching Trinity for many years and have seen D3 games for the last 15 years or so. There would be a mismatch of great proportions. As you may know I am a Trinity fan, but I have to be honest and still say no way. Take the 2011 team. With that line and skill players you're trying to say they couldn't beat a bad D3 team? D3 players are there for a reason. They're too small and/or too slow.
November 2, 201213 yr Skill players not that different, some but not overwheling. OL and DL is a HUGE difference.
November 2, 201213 yr They would get smoked but I don't think it would be that bad. Most possessions they would go 3 and out. The NFL team would move the ball at will on them. I think they would easily win by 50 points. It would be like a scrimmage between a varsity and a JV team. Gabbert threw for over 300 against Green Bay and he is a below average QB. I think he could pass the ball with ease. He is better than the Bama QB right now by a mile.
November 2, 201213 yr Skill players not that different, some but not overwheling. OL and DL is a HUGE difference. They would get mauled up front and with the complexity of the defenses they would have no idea what to do.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.