I noticed in the box score and game description from the PC/Garrard Co. game on Monday that Ty Perkins was not mentioned. He had that key technical foul called on him at the end of the PC/Somerset game on Thursday. I was wondering if he was sick, held out of the game by the coaching staff or left the team. It seemed as though the head coach was very upset after the technical--however, the paper didn't mention why he didn't play. I was just wondering if anyone had any information--I know he wasn't ejected so it couldn't be a KHSAA suspension.

I wondered the same thing when I read the paper today.

It was a coaching decision to sit him so I am told.

It was a coaching decision to sit him so I am told.

 

Maybe the Principal had a say in it also.

Maybe the Principal had a say in it also.

 

I was told that the school had a new policy because of the excessive Techinical Fouls that they recieve. The policy states that if you have one technical foul that you have to sit a game. Two gets you a week on the bench, and if you recieve a third technical you must sit for a month. If your wondering why Ty doesnt have to sit for a month, it is because Pulaski Principal Mike Deaton didnt put the rule into effect until after the problems that he saw during the Somerset/Pulaski game.

I was told that the school had a new policy because of the excessive Techinical Fouls that they recieve. The policy states that if you have one technical foul that you have to sit a game. Two gets you a week on the bench, and if you recieve a third technical you must sit for a month. If your wondering why Ty doesnt have to sit for a month, it is because Pulaski Principal Mike Deaton didnt put the rule into effect until after the problems that he saw during the Somerset/Pulaski game.

 

Sounds like a policy that Pulaski Co. needed, maybe this will help.

Fraley made the rule before basketball season started. The players signed a sheet in agreement. Deaton had nothing to do with it.