HHSDad

"Rightwing extremism in the United States can be broadly divided into those groups, movements, and adherents that are primarily hate-oriented (based on hatred of particular religious, racial or ethnic groups), and those that are mainly antigovernment, rejecting federal authority in favor of state or local authority, or rejecting government authority entirely. It may include groups and individuals that are dedicated to a single issue, such as opposition to abortion or immigration."

I was undecided as to whether to make this a public poll or not. But I figure that I should at least make Obama's Gestapo do its own dirty work.

"Rightwing extremism in the United States can be broadly divided into those groups, movements, and adherents that are primarily hate-oriented (based on hatred of particular religious, racial or ethnic groups), and those that are mainly antigovernment, rejecting federal authority in favor of state or local authority, or rejecting government authority entirely. It may include groups and individuals that are dedicated to a single issue, such as opposition to abortion or immigration."

I guess that makes me a rightwing extremist.

Would Obama have asked the same at a Muslim temple? I think not.

Love makes people crazy:lol:

Steroids make people crazy.

Do you really believe that stuff?

Absolutely.

delete

I bet you heard that on NPR....I consider myself liberal I classify people as terrorist who use violence against innocent people as a means to and end. That doesn't discriminate on the basis of race, nationality, religion, geographic location or even the nobility of the cause. So at least in my case your talk shows are wrong.

It's not "terrrorism" anymore. It's "man-made disasters" according to Janet Napolitano.

She's on the home page at Msn.com

The Tea Parties will have no effect whatsoever in Washington. We are asking for DC to release some of the power it has obtained from the states and from us, and that just ain't going to happen. The only thing that would make a difference is an absolute slaughter of the incumbents on election day.

Send in a carrier strike group. Put a couple of Hawkeyes in the air. You spot a pirate ship, send in a few Hornets. You spot a mother ship, send a Harpoon its way.

No, the comparison was to the reaction I received when I was upset about something in the previous administration. I'm not comparing this to the previous administrations actions. I'm comparing reactions to reactions.

Are they opposite but equal reactions?

Our policies on welfare would bury us if we chose this action. (Waiting on the politically correct to blast me).

You have to look at it with a positive attitude. By adopting poor Mexicans, we can lower the amount of income it takes to be under the poverty level, thereby allowing many more Americans to rise above poverty and become middle class citizens!

***sigh***

Maybe I can move to Texas.

I'm not wearing any rose colored glasses, and I'm not a blind follower. But I'm not sure what there is to get really upset about. Hey, I was told I was wrong when I was upset about the previous administrations support of tapping my phone. So, I'm not going to get upset now when apparently my rights are being somehow violated.

Like I said, go ahead and ride that train...but I'm telling you the bridge is out. Obama is going for total control of the US. What I can't figure out is whether he wants it to make us a Marxist nation; to make us apart of the one world government movement; he really hates America so he wants to bring us down; or he just loves power.

Bush may go down in history as the second worst president of the former United States of America having paved the way for the man who destroyed this country, Barack Obama.

And yeah, I'm extremely peeved that this administration is calling our soldiers dangerous to the United States as Obama sends more of them to Afghanistan.

I quit listening to Hannity. He's tiresome and a hack. I prefer someone who calls out both sides of the aisle.

As FKW said WOW!

Now if her next appearance can be on Extreme Makeover....

I'm just throwing out a warning for y'all. I was hoping that the blind followers of Barack would take off their rose colored glasses sooner than the Bush crowd did. But hey, I can make a living in a bankrupt, socialist nation. You'll still have to pay taxes and LOTS of them.

I don't like Texas. I say give 'em to Mexico.

I say that we just give Texas & the lower half of California to Mexico. I'd give them all of California, but I want to go to San Fancisco & the Napa Valley some day. I think we should keep Los Angeles too. My future daughter in law hails from there.

Texas is doing better than most states in this recession. Especially when you compare it to the large liberal states like New York and California. So, I vote we keep Texas.

I've been saying for a while (seriously) that we should offer annexation to Mexico. Mexico has 31 states plus the Federal District, so some consolidation would have to be done. Say maybe 6 states centered on (or in) Ecatepec, Guadalajara, Veracruz, Mexico City, Chihuahua, and Monterrey.

I'm confused at your response HHS. Are you saying Homeland Security should not look into Right Wing Groups?

 

Despite the Oklahoma City evidence that they are worth investigating? :confused:

If you read the whole report, you find that they are defining right wing extremists include those who believe in the 10th amendment, 2nd amendment, returning troops, etc. Because one doesn't agree with the government makes one dangerous?

Key Findings

Mine all of their ports. (I thought PepRock would like that idea.)

Actually, his real name was Vlad Țepeş. The Dracula moniker came later.

Vlad Dracul was Dracula's father. Dracul as in "the dragon".

Can we use claymores too?

Can you provide some links to the comments that you are talking about (besides the "France" one)?

President Obama to Europe: Sorry About the Bush Years in Istanbul