46 Sprint Out

Everything is open to individual interpretation, DRAGON PAPPY. There is nothing wrong with your insight.

Harlan did make it to the region finals in 99. The other years I'm unsure of. As for the other teams in the county, I'm thinking it's been more than 10 years since any team advanced out of the first round. With the new playoff format, however, I do see Cumberland as one the county favorite to break that streak this year.

In some cases, it's a combo coverage, but 90 percent of the time, it really is a man coverage, just disguised somewhat

Not at all. Where Cawood has played for the last decade a simple 3 Deep coverage, the secondary's role has been more of a "last result" buffer between the offense and the endzone. Coach Perry's system is a 7 man front system, but in facing dominant running schemes, more men are often needed at the line of scrimmage. The adjustment to this is sometimes complicated, and takes a little while for adjustment.

You'll probobly see around 70 percent of triple option offensively. Defensively, Cawood will need alot of work in the secondary to play this style of defense; in Coach Perry's defense they will have a tons of more responsibility placed on them, from blitzing to playing alot more man coverage.

In hiring a new coach right after the season, and without the new school being complete, the new coach would sure have to be sound from an organizational aspect, since all three teams would still be training in their respective schools. Exactly how would a person get all of these kids together to promote some unity before the summer practices start? I just thought of that for some reason, but it is definately an issue that will have to be adressed by the new football coach

Or maybe more of like the "Vanderbilts of the South"

If I'm not mistaken, wasn't this Cumberland's first time to make the playoffs in about 3 or 4 years? They may have beaten Harlan, but that hasn't exactly made them a football powerhouse. They may have had sucess within the county, but they haven't by any means throughout the district. They are usually one of the district's most talented teams. I think a step up in their out of district schedule will pay dividends for them.

Haha.......well, you know, they could have just given me "extra service pay." BTW.....I'll third the notion on Jim Roark.

Yeah, I did, but my fax machine was broken and it took 4 days to get someone over to work on it, so I couldn't send a resume to the school.

http://www.khsaa.org/handbook/bylaws/bylaw27.pdf I'm not arguing that hiring someone out of the school is against the law. If you look at Section 2 b) i) and take it's meaning verbatum, the recommendation(s) by the superintendent are offered to the principal, just as youve said. Then by "consulting with the School Based Council" prior to the final selection, the principal makes his decision, which is finalized by the superintendent. I guess most of it's a matter of interpretation, but that's my literal perception of the rule

And Mountain..........with your ideas, I'm sure it could be a match ranking up there with the "bloodletters" Dusty Rhodes and the Nature Boy used to have back in the day

For the sake of my personel well-being, I would hope that that Blade did stay in retirement. That is way too much for the likes of a common man to handle

I'm with you inasmuch as thinking that Coach Perry would have been the coach in one form or another. It's obvious by now the way I feel. I'm just questioning standard procedure. Cawood is fortunate to have Eric, and fans can expect to see a much improved team (funadamentaly and physically) starting this fall.

I think I could make whyme tap out.....

The next time I see whyme, I'm going to call Waggle_12 and we all 3 can have a big group hug.

Cawoodballplayer, since you seem to have the inside track I'm looking for on this, maybe you could answer something for me. Though the waiver was issued, personel from within the school system should still have been given the first chance to apply for, and take the job. Issuing a waiver for this "emergency" makes little sense if the job was sought after by any of the current employees from within the school system. What I am asking is this.......was anyone currently employed by Cawood High School or its feeder systems that not only expressed interest in the position, but pursued the postion for themselves? If you can find an answer to that sometime, things would begin to show face for yours truly.

Bylaw 27, Section 2 (b) says it does. I'm arguing fact here

Yes, I'm aware that the superintendent cannot place a vote. I was defending the schoolboard's position to increase the taxes in my comments. The issue of urging to me carries little weight in regards to concrete actions or votes, so I won't argue that.

While he may not have voted for these contracts, he really didn't vote against them did he? And with the student to teacher ratio, do you mean teacher-student ratio? Because if the student/teacher ratio was voted to be lower, would that not suggest the hiring of more educators? Wouldn't raising taxes help the school system? I have forgotten, maybe someone can refresh my memory: how much exactly were the actual numbers on the tax increase? Whyme, maybe you can clarify that for me. As to your post, I think I know what you meant, but misunderstood what you said.

Say what you want, but personally this process is due a more delicate analysis. For this issue to die, there are certain aspects of this process that need supporting evidence. 4 things are needed to quell public discontent. Our taxes fund these programs, so it is public right to see how certain expenditures are distributed through the school system. 1) A dated notice, bringing to light the newly vacated coaching position to school employees describing the job opening 2) Coaching resumes presented to the superintendent, proof of all background checks, and proof that all law abiding candidates had those presented to the Cawood school board. 3) Proof that all present board members were given these resumes to be reviewed 4) The minutes of the board meeting, detaling their deliberations and the subsuquent final decision. If all these details are documented, then there is a reasonable basis to let the issue die. If not, then the controversy has only begun.

First and foremost, allow me to clarify that my emotions are in check, and that any sleep I may have lost over this period can not be attributed to this situation. My issue here is more of the potential manipulation of laws in this in this specific hiring, not in the person hired. My future argument will validate some of Whyme's claims, while at the same time, validate the basis of my own Whyme- From your standpoint, there is a degree of validity. Teaching positions must be posted in the manner you descibed. Emergency hirings are common, in a matter of an interim basis, BUT the newly accquired professional's job is reevaluated at the end of the school year. Then, the job is once again re-opened for interested suiters, and the newly accquired employee is given an opportunity to regain that job on a permanent basis. From your point, it is given that a job does not have to be posted for the full 30 days, but the job would have to be posted nonetheless. The basis of my statements comes as follows. Frank Smith's official resignation was confirmed by principal Mike Ashurst on Monday, January 8th. Coach Perry's subsequent hiring took place three days following Coach Smith's resignation on January 11th as reported by the January 8th and 11th editions of the Harlan Daily Enterprise. A summerization of bylaw 27 of the KHSAA states the following. A Level 1 Coach is a "certified teacher and member of the regular school system faculty employed a minimum of 3 regular periods for teaching classes..." A Level 2 Coach (in Coach Perry's case) is at least 21, not a violent convicted criminal, that has at least 64 hours or is a high school graduate. The difference in hiring a Level 2 coach comes as follows. In the absence of a Level 1 applicant, the superintendent may make notice of the opening, providing a list of qualified coaches to the local school Principal, who in deliberating with the School Based Council will make a decision that is finalized by the superintendent. This follows an earlier process where the superintendent declares a "reasonable" notice that no Level 1 individual had applied for the position. WHYME-----Here is where I discovered the basis of your argument in Bylaw 27 (d) (iv) that states: "In the event that the member school is unable to staff head or assistant coaching positions in any sport activity (including cheerleading) with a Level 1 of Level 2 individual, the member school may request through the Superintendent that the KHSAA allow for a one-time waiver of this rule in order that the additional time be avaliable to find an applicant meeting the criteria." Through this however, I do find some contradiction in that 1)noone within the school system placed interest in this job (and maybe so because of the rapidity of the selection process, which is, very open to debate from both sides), and, 2) that Coach Perry was the only potential suiter over the age of 21 with a high school, or college education and clear criminal background. From this, I think my argument gains some momentum. Secondly, in the timeframe of approximately 2 and a half days the following had to happen. A notice of the open coaching position must have been made avaliable to all qualified Level 1 personel within the high school, in addition to its 6 elementary feeder schools, with each having the opportunity to request inquiry of the position. After the first sequence, the job had to be opened to potential outside suiters with no scholastic employment connections (some of these people including the current Cawood assistants and the coaches on the jr. high and elementary levels), each given a personal background check and presented by the superintendent to the school board, which had to have met between January 8th and by the latest the 11th. The school board from there, had to narrow down the list of options, deriving from the list the best candidate possible to fulfill the job opening. To me, the other candidates' qualities were sacrified in a short termed formality, where the sucessor to Coach Smith's job was already predetermined. The speed in which this all took place is perplexing. Infact, it probobly presents itself in the same manner to the KHSAA. The job opening has yet to be found in the KHSAA website, possibly meaning the due process of their laws have not been followed. In sharp contrast: as of 2:20 PM, Jan. 23rd, the KHSAA updated masterserve still recognizes Frank Smith as the head football coach of Cawood High School. All this culminates in my thinking that the current hiring perhaps, overstepped some crucial boundaries. So in putting this together, I hope that I may have stated my point with accuracy and without bias. For everyone reading, these events have formed the basis of my opinion which is hopefully valid.

If rules are rules, then you have recognized that punishments are deterents existing for those unwilling to comply with ceratain implemented standards. So yes, stepping outside the boundaries in hiring Coach Perry does matter. Assistants within the administration CAN be hired without being brought before a council, hence they can begin to implement the offseason programs without the supervision of an established head coach. My grievence exists not in the case of coach Perry's hiring, but in the manner in which the hiring process was conducted. Perhaps the application and interview process would have served as a formality, but it would have been a structured sequence of events satisfying of our state's rules of conduct nonetheless. The staff at Cawood and the Central Office do have many afforded powers. However, the power to veto state laws and established guidelines does not dwell in their realm of expertise. Proper procedure would demand the reposting of this job, and a fair and impartial interview process for all applicants, period.

That's definately a step up for Cumberland in regards to the out of district schedules of years past. Congratulations to them, I think they will be a dangerous team next year, and playing a somewhat higher level of competition will only help them come playoff time.

If, infact, Coach Perry is the most qualified candidate to take the job, then he very well deserves his appointed position. However, by disreguading the standard procedures established in the official hiring process, the seated powers at Cawood have blatently disreguarded the implemented system and have taken the law into their own hands. Coach Perry's credentials as a quality assistant coach are legit, and unquestionable, without a doubt. To build a quality program though, is it not necessary to comply with the rules? The manner of his hiring obviously proves contradictory. Had this taken place in a higher profile program, I'm sure many heads would have been turned, followed by subsequent penalties. As for your comments of my supposed "tearing the program down," I am throughly perplexed. Rest assured I had nothing to do with Cawood's 25 losses over the past 3 seasons, and have great faith that my alliances fulfill their occupations with class, dignity, and respect for the rules (WRITTEN and unwritten) of the game. If in fact Coach Perry is the best suiter for the kids, only time will tell. If the head coaching position best suits Coach Perry, it still will (would) after the allocated 30 day period for further applications.