I am shocked by this score, I figured it being at MC would be the difference. This could be LONG season for the Raiders and I don't mean two or three deep in the playoffs. Now some of those "winnable" games we kept hearing about don't seem so "winnable"

Def. played well forced 5 Turnovers. Off did not play well. Got work to do, on to Pineville.

Do you still stand by your prediction that there are 8 winnable games?

Do you still stand by your prediction that there are 8 winnable games?

What does it take to get it through your head no One said McCreary would win 8 games. I said 8 winnable games there is a difference. Now there are 7 winnable games that does not mean McCreary will win 7 games. It could be 0 or 7. Hope you understand Now.

When you lost to Taylor, I think that it is time to re-evaluate what is a "winnable game" on the schedule.

Do you still stand by your prediction that there are 8 winnable games?

 

Cellking is a expert in all sports. Raiders have a lot of work to do. They are young in the skill positions. If they can beat Casey, it is will be like before a sucussful season.

Cellking is a expert in all sports. Raiders have a lot of work to do. They are young in the skill positions. If they can beat Casey, it is will be like before a sucussful season.

Better to be an Expert in All, Than an Expert in nothing like you. JMO>

Banker you are kidding about being young in the skilled positions right? Mot of the Raiders starting skilled players are juniors and seniors as is most of the line. The Raiders are anything but young this year and are very talented they just have to get some confidence and focus on the fundamentals!

I never said there were 7/8 winnable games. As a matter of fact I said you will not win a district game, much less 8. And like the Banker I am going on the record and saying there are not 4 winnable games on the schedule.

I never said there were 7/8 winnable games. As a matter of fact I said you will not win a district game, much less 8. And like the Banker I am going on the record and saying there are not 4 winnable games on the schedule.

You still don't get it.

Cellking please read all the McCreary Central posts, both in this thread, in the McCreary 2011 thread. Read them objectively. Then you will see I actually do get it. You and HOP bleed maroon, and I understand that. I applaud your support of your team. There is no way I would want to kiss Robert Jones. When I said if you win 8 Ill kiss Robert Jones, I knew that was a safe bet.

I do Bleed Maroon. Just want McCreary to be successful. I agree with you Pineville is a make or break game for the raiders to have any shot at a successful season.

Cellking, define successful season. Pineville is not a district game, and really other than a tiebreaker should have not any bearing on a it being a successful season. Wins in the district and playoff success should be the gauge of whether a season is successful, JMO.

Blazer with no disrespect If McCreary wins 3 or 4 games this year it will be something they can build on and with that it will be a successful season. Winning one district game and making it back to the playoffs would be icing on the cake. Right now beating Pineville is huge for McCreary and could be the confidence they need to have a successful season and right now the Raiders need to gain confidence and keep keep improving their fundamentals and I support them in their quest and I have confidence they can get the job done! Go get'em guys!

Cellking, define successful season. Pineville is not a district game, and really other than a tiebreaker should have not any bearing on a it being a successful season. Wins in the district and playoff success should be the gauge of whether a season is successful, JMO.

HOP ANSWERED YOUR QUESTION BETTER THAN I COULD HAVE.