Any details on the game?

Stansberry played well. Cooper tried hard, but Bradley did not play for the Jags.

Was the final score closer than the game really was or did the Jags make it a game throughout even without Bradley?

Was the final score closer than the game really was or did the Jags make it a game throughout even without Bradley?

 

No I would say the final score was about right. Dixie had 21 points after one quarter. Cooper played hard, but were simply overmatched in this one. Bradley would have helped but Dixie's coach played 8 or 9 guys tonight too.

Stansberry played well. Cooper tried hard, but Bradley did not play for the Jags.

 

Just a game to game thing with Bradley? They need him to have any chnace of upsetting Boone Co. in the district.

Bradley is not only the most talented player for the Jags, but also their emotional leader. They're a very different team without him.

Dixie jumps out to a 19 point lead at the half.

 

The Colonels are now 23-3. Looks like a typo by the Enquirer.

 

Dixie Heights 58, Cooper 45

 

Dixie (21-3) - Trammel 3 0 7, Stansberry 6 2 17, Wigger 1 3 6, Pike 2 4 8, Hatton 7 2 18, Muntis 1 0 2.

 

Cooper (10-15) - Langley 6 2 18, Thompson 1 1 4, Klute 2 2 6, Webster 4 0 9, Collins 2 0 4, Maniaccia 2 0 4.

 

[chart]

|Dixie|21|15|8|14| -58|

|Cooper|10|7|14|14| -45|

[end chart]

3-pointers: D 7 (Trammel, Stansberry 3, Wigger, Hatton 2); C 4 (Langley 2, Thompson, Webster).