Garrard Co. 30-6.

'Bout right Ol' Buddy, I like that score. Garrard is better than many think, or can be if they play like they are capable of.

Powell County has some Seniors that have started all four years of High School. They want to go out with a bang. Look for a close game here. Powell took Magoffin to Overtime, and I look for this one to end the same way. Timmy, Quentin, Tyler...work hard boys!

Powell 32

Garrard 30

I have been negative towards the coaching staff because I think the play calling has been bad this year. It is nothing personal. It is just facts. If you are going to win you have to call plays to get YOUR best player involved. He shouldn't been standing on the sideline on 3rd and 10 or running plays in and out!!!!!!

 

I have no dog in this fight. I just call it like I see it. Also, I never said Garrard should beat Anderson or Somerset, but they SHOULD have won the other games!

 

But when you say that "the COACH or one of the coaches has something personal against their best offensive player", how can that not be taken as a personal insult as opposed to just disagreeing with the playcalling? I have disagreed with some of the playcalling and would like to see some of the playmakers get more touches. I also don't have a dog in this fight. However, I do know for a fact that the coaching staff is working behind the scenes to help some of these kids get noticed by collegiate coaches. Considering how few coaches do this anymore, it shows me that there is no personal bad feelings towards any player as you have alluded to. I also have seen most of the Garrard games this year, and Ray has drawn a great of attention in most of those games. Defenses were often geared to stopping him. If you see that, as a coach, you have to try something else that you believe has a better chance at working. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. Sometimes, players also need a blow. Ray (for example) returns kicks, plays both ways, and makes plays both ways (46 tackles, leads team in scoring and yardage, has 5 fumble recoveries, etc). He is on the field the vast majority of the time. 2 way players need a blow every once in a while as well.

 

Would I like to see Ray get more touches on offense? Sure. But there is more than meets the eye. Accusing coaches as you have is MUCH different than just disagreeing with the playcalling.

But when you say that "the COACH or one of the coaches has something personal against their best offensive player", how can that not be taken as a personal insult as opposed to just disagreeing with the playcalling? I have disagreed with some of the playcalling and would like to see some of the playmakers get more touches. I also don't have a dog in this fight. However, I do know for a fact that the coaching staff is working behind the scenes to help some of these kids get noticed by collegiate coaches. Considering how few coaches do this anymore, it shows me that there is no personal bad feelings towards any player as you have alluded to. I also have seen most of the Garrard games this year, and Ray has drawn a great of attention in most of those games. Defenses were often geared to stopping him. If you see that, as a coach, you have to try something else that you believe has a better chance at working. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. Sometimes, players also need a blow. Ray (for example) returns kicks, plays both ways, and makes plays both ways (46 tackles, leads team in scoring and yardage, has 5 fumble recoveries, etc). He is on the field the vast majority of the time. 2 way players need a blow every once in a while as well.

 

Would I like to see Ray get more touches on offense? Sure. But there is more than meets the eye. Accusing coaches as you have is MUCH different than just disagreeing with the playcalling.

 

This is the exact quote that I said, "It looks like to me that the COACH or one of the coaches has something personal against their best offensive player."