January 11, 200818 yr The question I have now is... Does this move boost his chances or hurt him? Does it get people's attention and make them think, "I want this guy because it's going to lower taxes and put money in my pocket."? Or, does it come off as a somewhat desperate attempt to get his name back in the picture? Will people take a more cynical look at this move? Issue voters, cynical and desperate. Normal American voters, love it because it is a promise to put money in their pocket.
January 11, 200818 yr lbbc, If the two nominations are Hillary and Gulianni, who would you vote for? Just curious.
January 11, 200818 yr lbbc, If the two nominations are Hillary and Gulianni, who would you vote for? Just curious. Same person that I voted for in the gubernational race. My wife:D And that is not just a Hillary thing. Put Obama and Edwards in that category too. I cannot vote for anyone that thinks killing unborn babies is a thing this country should support.
January 11, 200818 yr Author Issue voters, cynical and desperate. Normal American voters, love it because it is a promise to put money in their pocket. So, overall, does it help or hurt him?
January 11, 200818 yr So, overall, does it help or hurt him? IMO, there are many, many more uninformed normal American voters that are worrying about their pocketbooks than there are issue voters.
January 11, 200818 yr lbbc, If the two nominations are Hillary and Gulianni, who would you vote for? Just curious. 1. Most any republican 2. Obama 3. Guliani 4. Edwards 5. The Anti-Christ 6. Hillary So, overall, does it help or hurt him? I think the net effect on an announcement like this is neutral. They're throw away words, because they've been heard so much. Voters would rather hear a solid fiscal plan.
January 11, 200818 yr 1. Most any republican 2. Obama 3. Guliani 4. Edwards 5. The Anti-Christ 6. Hillary I think the net effect on an announcement like this is neutral. They're throw away words, because they've been heard so much. Voters would rather hear a solid fiscal plan. So you would vote for Bill at #5 before Hillary? :jump::bunny::laugh::banana::sssh::eek::lol::dancingpa:cool: Is that enough emoticons to show that it was a joke?
January 11, 200818 yr So you would vote for Bill at #5 before Hillary? :jump::bunny::laugh::banana::sssh::eek::lol::dancingpa:cool: Is that enough emoticons to show that it was a joke? I thought you would ask if #5 and #6 weren't the same.
January 11, 200818 yr I thought you would ask if #5 and #6 weren't the same. Actually if Hillary was prolife, support of the war, for cutting taxes, for protection of marriage, wanted stronger immigration laws, and some other things, I would vote for her.
January 11, 200818 yr The question I have now is... Does this move boost his chances or hurt him? Does it get people's attention and make them think, "I want this guy because it's going to lower taxes and put money in my pocket."? Or, does it come off as a somewhat desperate attempt to get his name back in the picture? Will people take a more cynical look at this move? Don't know the answer to those questions. My old thermodynamics professor used to use the axiom that "there is no free lunch" in his teaching. Judging by the way many people grossly mismanage their own personal finances, I think a large part of our country fails to grasp that fact.
January 11, 200818 yr Don't know the answer to those questions. My old thermodynamics professor used to use the axiom that "there is no free lunch" in his teaching. Judging by the way many people grossly mismanage their own personal finances, I think a large part of our country fails to grasp that fact. Political entropy?
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.