September 6, 200719 yr :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: This attempt at a "news" article is your smoking gun?! The only problem is — Newsweek knew better. Reporter Eve Conant, who interviewed Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla., the ranking member of the Environment & Public Works Committee, was given all the latest data proving conclusively that it is the proponents of man-made global warming fears that enjoy a monumental funding advantage over the skeptics. (A whopping $50 billion to a paltry $19 million for skeptics — yes, that is billion to million. http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2007/8/6/100434.shtml I say again: what convoluted motive would exist to fund that "whopping" $50 billion for climate change research if manmade climate change was a hoax? You keep pointing breathlessly at how much money is being spent on climate change research. You haven't articulated a sensible reason for why such an immense amount of money would be made available to research a bogus issue. :bunny:
September 6, 200719 yr I say again: what convoluted motive would exist to fund that "whopping" $50 billion for climate change research if manmade climate change was a hoax? You keep pointing breathlessly at how much money is being spent on climate change research. You haven't articulated a sensible reason for why such an immense amount of money would be made available to research a bogus issue. :bunny: Umm...election? :sssh:
September 6, 200719 yr Umm...election? :sssh: Who can afford to spend $50 billion to win an election? That's more than ExxonMobil's net profit last year!
September 6, 200719 yr Author Who can afford to spend $50 billion to win an election? That's more than ExxonMobil's net profit last year!If it was one organization, you would be right, but it's a lot of left-wingers with money and left wing organizations. BF is right on the nose, politics is a major reason why. You keep pointing breathlessly at how global warming is man-made. Where is your proof? :bunny: I'll stand by the thousands of climatologists around the world who keep each other honest and have concluded that CO2 emissions from human activity aren't the cause behind global warming. There's that pesky two way street again.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.