9 minutes ago, MJAlltheWay24 said:

I'm interested as well. I feel like the committee will probably give them the benefit of the doubt and still a better seed than they deserve because of the injuries. But others that dealt with them throughout the year won't get the same luxury.

It has always been a source of frustration with me. I am cool with whatever the rule is, but make it consistent. I think of the Zion Williamson season. I will never forget the Blue Devils getting the benefit of the doubt and capturing a #1 seed because of Zion's absences. Cool. Then two minutes later UNC was awarded a #1 seed because of their run in the ACC and twice beating Duke (without Zion). So Duke's losses were discounted, but UNC's victories against a discounted team got rewarded. You can't have it both ways.

5 hours ago, Voice of Reason said:

Does UC have to win this tournament to get into the dance?

Ran in to Jeff Goodman last night before the UC game and he had the same opinion as me. 

Beat Baylor and have other teams lose on the current bubble and it gets interesting. Make it to the finals and they're a lock as a 10 or 11 seed. 

They're currently #34 in the NET following this win.