I am assuming you think Scott County will burst Douglas's bubble? In my opinion it will be the other way around. I just can't see SC playing with FD. It's not just that FD is bigger stronger and faster I just can't find one advantage that goes to SC. The only thing that gives SC a chance in my opinion is their scheme and discipline but I just don't think it will be enough this year. All that being said, I have thought the same thing before about SC and they have proved me wrong. Now that I have talked in a circle I'll just say I hope it's a good game.

 

How big are the FD lines? Are you saying they are bigger, faster, and stronger than SC? That's a bold statement.

Faster? Maybe. Bigger? I don't think so. Scott County's offensive and Defensive Line is massive. Douglass has yet to see anyone who is going to line up and try and punch you straight in the mouth. I believe Douglass will really struggle responding to SC's physicality. Typically, running/duel threat QBs have given SC a lot of trouble in the past. Pocket passers not as much (Moeller's QB vs La Salle's QB). I think this game will come to prove that Douglass is not as high as everyone is selling them to be. Going from playing teams like Wayne, Paintsville, Tates Creek, Station and Dunbar to a team like Scott County is going to be very difficult for the Broncos. All that being said, the first game between the two will only determine who will have homefield advantage in the playoff game.

 

Bigger or as big, significantly faster, significantly more athletic, and deeper. Yes, I have seen both play. Battle tested is great but overrated in my opinion. Moeller game was a little flukey with the rain, etc. and La Salles smacked SC and it wasn't because they had a dt qb. IMO SC will be surprised and will have a hard time keeping up. I am not a FD fan in any way and I hope I am wrong but having seen both teams last year and this year I think it's FD's to lose.

How big are the FD lines? Are you saying they are bigger, faster, and stronger than SC? That's a bold statement.

 

There's not a big difference in size if any but FD's lines look significantly more athletic....particularly on the defensive side.

There's not a big difference in size if any but FD's lines look significantly more athletic....particularly on the defensive side.

 

Who for FD is better than Hudson?

There's not a big difference in size if any but FD's lines look significantly more athletic....particularly on the defensive side.

 

Who for FD is better than Hudson?

 

John Riggins ... before you stick your whole foot in your mouth, Scott Co. OT Bryan Hudson is one of the top OT in the nation, has multiple D1 offers including from Alabama and has committed to Virginia Tech. And before you try to say he isn't athletic, he already owns the 3A state shot put record, will likely break the state record in the spring that has stood since 1969 and is considered a possible future Olympian in the shot put. I believe he finished fifth at the nationals this summer.

Edited September 26, 20187 yr by Voice of Reason

Who for FD is better than Hudson?

 

Did I say any one person was better?

John Riggins ... before you stick your whole foot in your mouth, Scott Co. OT Bryan Hudson is one of the top OT in the nation, has multiple D1 offers including from Alabama and has committed to Virginia Tech. And before you try to say he isn't athletic, he already owns the 3A state shot put record, will likely break the state record in the spring that has stood since 1969 and is considered a possible future Olympian in the shot put. I believe he finished fifth at the nationals this summer.

 

I am well aware of Mr. Hudson. Last I checked he is one person and only plays in one position on the line at a time. Has that changed? Has he multiplied? If not I'll stick to MY OPINION about the offensive and defensive lines as a unit. FD has a couple D-1 tackles that I am aware of. Both juniors and one with offers from Clemson, Notre Dame, etc.. As for the TEAM (it is a team game not 1 on 1's still....right?) I don't think you want to start comparing who has offers.

I think its a little early to say FD is the better team the game hasn't been played yet. This is what I know SC strength of schedule is 20.7 and FD is 1.7. I know this does not mean they are better but it does mean they have been tried and tested and lost to a top 10 team from Ohio. I think you need to wait and see. You could be eating crow.

I think its a little early to say FD is the better team the game hasn't been played yet. This is what I know SC strength of schedule is 20.7 and FD is 1.7. I know this does not mean they are better but it does mean they have been tried and tested and lost to a top 10 team from Ohio. I think you need to wait and see. You could be eating crow.

 

What fun would that be? It's an opinion before the game is played because that's what people do on forums. For what's it's worth I have watched Scott county in pre game warm ups and thought, man there's no way they can compete with whatever team they were playing. Well, I was wrong and SC whooped them.