October 9, 20178 yr Who cares how talented Eifert is? He's a twig. Talent doesn't matter when you can't get on the field. I'd absolutely move on from him if I were the Bengals. Agreed
October 10, 20178 yr Who cares how talented Eifert is? He's a twig. Talent doesn't matter when you can't get on the field. I'd absolutely move on from him if I were the Bengals. Fair enough. Do you feel the same about Gronk? You may have already said it, so I'm just really asking because I can't remember.
October 10, 20178 yr Fair enough. Do you feel the same about Gronk? You may have already said it, so I'm just really asking because I can't remember. Are you trying to compare the two? Gronk is the 5th fastest player in NFL history to get to 70 TDs. Quite a bit different than Eifert, but to answer your question, I think Gronk is closer to being done for good than not and it's why I wanted them to bring Bennett back this past off-season.
October 10, 20178 yr Are you trying to compare the two? Gronk is the 5th fastest player in NFL history to get to 70 TDs. Quite a bit different than Eifert, but to answer your question, I think Gronk is closer to being done for good than not and it's why I wanted them to bring Bennett back this past off-season. Not comparing at all. Gronk is a freak and when healthy always dominated. I just know he has been hurt a lot too. So wasn't sure if you felt they should keep him and continue paying him or not.
October 10, 20178 yr Not comparing at all. Gronk is a freak and when healthy always dominated. I just know he has been hurt a lot too. So wasn't sure if you felt they should keep him and continue paying him or not. That's the big difference IMO. Gronk has shown when healthy he's dominant. Eifert has shown nothing IMO. FWIW, I don't think the Patriots stick with Gronk much longer if he doesn't prove to be capable of staying on the field.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.