Final

Another 6A team wins! This is terrific. Scott is not a slouch. Some justification for recent lofty ranking for Conner.

I agree that this helps Conner, and it is the result I expected. Scott is solid but just that - a solid 4A team. Any team in the top 15 of 6A would beat Scott by a similar score.

Don't over analyze. Conner will not compete with Ryle in that district. If Conner faces SK on turf the Neers blow them out. Scott is a good, stress good, 4A team. Conner is an average to below average 6A team. I hope we get to see Trosper and the Cougars at the Pioneer Country Club.

Edited September 9, 20179 yr by GoIrish20

Congratulations to the Conner Cougars! I did not expect this result. I thought either team could get the win. So the Cougars won this by a bigger margin than I expected. Perhaps things are coming together for them.

I give credit to Conner but the Score was much closer, Scott gave this game away.

Few key Penalties on Scott to give Conner new life, 1-2 big throws by Conner QB, a fumble at the 2 yard line by Scott, 3 Dropped catches by Scott Receiver were gonna be (2 TDS) in End zone and Kick off coverage was not good for Scott which led to a kickoff return to open the 3rd Qtr...

 

Just a few things, Scott was way bigger up front, faster speed, and more physical than Conner IMO...It just came down to a few things Scott needs to tighten up...

Score could of been 34-21 Scott.

 

Conner just made plays and took advantage of a few bad calls against Scott for the Win, but by no means is Conner better than Scott on Paper, just on the Scoreboard...

I give credit to Conner but the Score was much closer, Scott gave this game away.

Few key Penalties on Scott to give Conner new life, 1-2 big throws by Conner QB, a fumble at the 2 yard line by Scott, 3 Dropped catches by Scott Receiver were gonna be (2 TDS) in End zone and Kick off coverage was not good for Scott which led to a kickoff return to open the 3rd Qtr...

 

Just a few things, Scott was way bigger up front, faster speed, and more physical than Conner IMO...It just came down to a few things Scott needs to tighten up...

Score could of been 34-21 Scott.

 

Conner just made plays and took advantage of a few bad calls against Scott for the Win, but by no means is Conner better than Scott on Paper, just on the Scoreboard...

 

The bolded is why I thought this game could go either way and gave the nod to Scott, though I was rooting for Conner.

I give credit to Conner but the Score was much closer, Scott gave this game away.

Few key Penalties on Scott to give Conner new life, 1-2 big throws by Conner QB, a fumble at the 2 yard line by Scott, 3 Dropped catches by Scott Receiver were gonna be (2 TDS) in End zone and Kick off coverage was not good for Scott which led to a kickoff return to open the 3rd Qtr...

 

Just a few things, Scott was way bigger up front, faster speed, and more physical than Conner IMO...It just came down to a few things Scott needs to tighten up...

Score could of been 34-21 Scott.

 

Conner just made plays and took advantage of a few bad calls against Scott for the Win, but by no means is Conner better than Scott on Paper, just on the Scoreboard...

 

If Conner doesnt exhale and relax after going up 34-7, with 8 minutes to go in the 3rd quarter...

Scott went for it on 4th and less than a yard three times and got stopped every time in the first half.

Scott faster speed should have helped on the 3 sweeps for TD Conner had with the shortest one going for 30 yards.

Conner does have Simpson and Webster. Both are fast.