I know he has it and he's using it. For optics alone that doesn't seem like a smart move.

 

 

How in the world would you know that? If you know all of that then you are surely close enough to him to know what he's using it for as well. So spill the beans...

Also I see some saying the phone is Android, other's say it's a Blackberry. For someone that hasn't had a Blackberry in years, are they now running the Android OS? If so, I'm going to have to check out their new phone models.

Also I see some saying the phone is Android, other's say it's a Blackberry. For someone that hasn't had a Blackberry in years, are they now running the Android OS? If so, I'm going to have to check out their new phone models.

Newer models run Android or Blackberry's OS 10, which runs Android apps available on the Amazon App Store under emulation. The PRIV runs Blackberry software on top of Android Marshmallow and has gotten great reviews. The square Passport model runs Android software on top of Blackberry OS 10.

 

I have an old Blackberry tablet that I no longer use, but I still have not had a phone that manages email accounts as well as it does.

Agree he should get rid of it, but based on what I've read, this isn't close to what Hillary did (and then tried to cover up )

 

Yet.

Yet.

 

Exactly. He hasn't done anything wrong. Glad you see it my way.

Exactly. He hasn't done anything wrong. Glad you see it my way.

 

He is tweetering in on the line. His pompousness will probably force him over.

He is tweetering in on the line. His pompousness will probably force him over.

 

So he hasn't done anything wrong?

He is tweetering in on the line. His pompousness will probably force him over.

So, the risk is that some foreign government would hack his unsecure, private phone and read his "tweeters?" Why would they not simply follow him on Twitter instead?

So he hasn't done anything wrong?

 

Technically if he still has phone. I guess he is.

So, the risk is that some foreign government would hack his unsecure, private phone and read his "tweeters?" Why would they not simply follow him on Twitter instead?

 

Who knows what else may be on there? Spray tan appts, hair blow outs, ivanka's baby's birthday invites, etc.

Who knows what else may be on there? Spray tan appts, hair blow outs, ivanka's baby's birthday invites, etc.

Would it be okay if the Trump administration required every cell phone to be government issued? That way, all of our phones would have some protection from hacking by foreign governments and it would reduce the chances that one of us could be blackmailed into committing a crime against our own government. Then, you might not know what is on Trump's phone, but the government would know and it would also know what is on your phone. That would only be fair, right?

Would it be okay if the Trump administration required every cell phone to be government issued? That way, all of our phones would have some protection from hacking by foreign governments and it would reduce the chances that one of us could be blackmailed into committing a crime against our own government. Then, you might not know what is on Trump's phone, but the government would know and it would also know what is on your phone. That would only be fair, right?

 

False equivalency between the president and citizens.

 

Do you honestly believe the president should have an unsecured device in 2017?

False equivalency between the president and citizens.

 

Do you honestly believe the president should have an unsecured device in 2017?

Absolutely. Trump did not surrender his citizenship when he became POTUS. It is amazing that you accuse me of engaging in drawing false equivalencies between innocent American citizens, at the same time you are trying in vain to establish a false equivalency between Hillary's compromising national security by mishandling classified documents and Trump tweeting on his own, privately owned phone.:lol2:

Absolutely. Trump did not surrender his citizenship when he became POTUS. It is amazing that you accuse me of engaging in drawing false equivalencies between innocent American citizens, at the same time you are trying in vain to establish a false equivalency between Hillary's compromising national security by mishandling classified documents and Trump tweeting on his own, privately owned phone.:lol2:

 

Sounds like we are headed down the same road, except this time, since it is your man, you are defending.

 

Been said on here many times before, but the greatest thing about this Trump presidency is the fact those on the right are now defending everything they hated about the Obama administration. :lol2:

Sounds like we are headed down the same road, except this time, since it is your man, you are defending.

 

Been said on here many times before, but the greatest thing about this Trump presidency is the fact those on the right are now defending everything they hated about the Obama administration. :lol2:

I don't know any Republican who had a problem with Hillary Clinton having a private phone or email account. Most of us had a problem with her using a private phone and email server to evade Freedom of Information Act requests, to conduct government business, and to illegally store and transfer classified documents.

 

You are the wrong spokesperson to make the case of moral equivalency between Trump and Hillary's use of private property. Trump may abuse his right to own and use private property in the future, but there is no evidence that he has done so. If he does, I will be the last person to defend him.